Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review tool

Mary Barnes <> Tue, 01 November 2011 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618D721F8E39 for <>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.091
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.091 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7c4Ss7D2Z+45 for <>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1C821F8E1E for <>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfl11 with SMTP id fl11so254439vcb.31 for <>; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mdlo+PtkOq/NGSYsDn9vvXS591njBG7K6rqUNdgOj8Y=; b=CoZlQrpFtLphkdctgb0gxu8XrdPS5iyGvAP75kC7Q+veKWSuNy7M3mhgugQe/ZmPF9 pI5Mcu2XkeITDwk7+WqGYM62A0pGTbFXbM6ifLUOy1SBr30mAVaJCfST4ttMOLehrh7Y RuFtdPR14MsFIjZvLKKGoxSuZPz/tL1kn0aC0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with SMTP id r17mr1352714vde.53.1320181490050; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:04:50 -0500
Message-ID: <>
From: Mary Barnes <>
To: "A. Jean Mahoney" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307c9b48c0e47f04b0b2b4c8"
Cc:, Henrik Levkowetz <>, Tero Kivinen <>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Now available - the Gen-ART review tool
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:35:53 -0000


Thanks for working with Henrik and Tero to get this done.

I have a question.  I see one of my assignments, but it is one that I
already reviewed.  If I click Done for the review, it seems I need to enter
the URL for the review.  Will we have to enter the URLs manually or will
those be populated by the tool?


On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, A. Jean Mahoney <> wrote:

> Hi all,
> The Gen-ART review tool is ready to be tested.
> Users of the review tool should have received automatically generated
> emails starting with "[genart review tool]".
> Steps on accessing and working with the tool can be found here:
> Please log in and check the My Info page for your user information, then
> check the My Queue page. Most reviewers should see one or more recent
> assignments, which are for documents currently in Last Call and/or on the
> November 3 Telechat. David, Elwyn, Kathleen, and Richard: your queues are
> empty for the moment.
> If the assignment is unfamiliar to you, I've probably fumbled something.
> Please reject the assignment. Otherwise, accept the assignment.
> As we're testing the tool, I'll continue to provide last call and telechat
> assignments in the traditional format. The gen-art.html page and the HTML
> assignment pages found on**dav/genart/<>will continue to be the official method of recording and assigning reviews
> until otherwise noted.
> Please let me know if you have trouble accessing the tool, questions on
> how it works, or any feedback. I'm collecting bugs and enhancement requests.
> Thanks to Tero Kivinen and Henrik Levkowetz for creating and helping set
> up this tool!
> Jean
> ______________________________**_________________
> Gen-art mailing list