IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 07 August 2014 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DAA1A0538 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 19:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFIHGp1-mEyT for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 19:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B9B1A034A for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 19:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C930C2CC64; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 05:11:10 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQPIGFiqBPef; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 05:11:03 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB852CC48; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 05:11:01 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_28D1AE0C-9DEF-4B7D-86A3-EA6B7468EA33"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGMkLC7kuDw9H-SLC0jiQxpoA6=utQOTBYM8erFV0e6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:10:56 +1200
Message-Id: <D634780E-FD0D-4328-8581-170BDDFE85F8@piuha.net>
References: <53DE7FDF.2010907@isode.com> <CAF4+nEGUmH6KUdBEu1FS1N-1fwxR+g1Vzs_m55y=FQsGAyG0pg@mail.gmail.com> <53DFC08C.90005@isode.com> <CAF4+nEGMkLC7kuDw9H-SLC0jiQxpoA6=utQOTBYM8erFV0e6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/KNnLlxPMLbrxrJ1i1XcWFotIcv8
Cc: "draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 02:11:18 -0000

Alexey, Donald: Many thanks for the review & the updates!

Jari

On 06 Aug 2014, at 07:42, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alexey,
> 
> These changes have been made a new version -06 has been posted.
> 
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
> 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
> d3e3e3@gmail.com
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Alexey Melnikov
> <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>> On 04/08/2014 18:16, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Alexey,
>> 
>> Hi Donald,
>> 
>>> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Alexey Melnikov
>>> <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>>>> 
>>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
>>>> may receive.
>>>> 
>>>> Document: draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05
>>>> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
>>>> Review Date: 3 August 2014
>>>> IETF LC End Date: 21 July 2014
>>>> IESG Telechat date: 7 August 2014
>>>> 
>>>> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
>>>> [Ready with nits]
>>>> 
>>>> Major issues: None
>>>> 
>>>> Minor issues:
>>>> 
>>>> Section 6.4: who allocated opcodes? I.e. is there a registry?
>>> 
>>> These OAM OpCodes were created by and originally all under the control
>>> of IEEE 802.1; however, 802.1 allocated the block of 32 OpCodes from
>>> 32 to 63 to ITU-T as documented in [802.1Q]. I don't think ITU-T
>>> maintains an explicit registry other than the listing of assigned
>>> OpCodes out of their range that appears in [Y.1731] but I could be
>>> wrong.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps a sentence could be added to the end of Section 6.4 such as
>>> "These OpCodes are from the range of values that has been allocated by
>>> IEEE 802.1 [802.1Q] for control by ITU-T."
>> 
>> I think that would be very helpful. Otherwise there is a question why there
>> is no IANA registry for these and your extra sentence would address that.
>> 
>>>> Nits:
>>>> 
>>>> I think it would be better to say that all "Reserved" fields are set to 0
>>>> by
>>>> the sender and ignored by the receiver.
>>> 
>>> I'll check with the other authors on that.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email