IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 05 August 2014 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407261A011F for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWY4gR7tzQvS for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53C21A002D for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id h136so948899oig.21 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cFAQG7I6g7DTSgiQvBLZe0Dx9Yb6dgtMUnh5SNEoqJE=; b=jlcUSDbqwpg1ggiVUNd8d7Zko/jwCEM+SJOksUlA0KB9ag4RU/e6QPq7rX4u9P7FEY rpkXEHD4C2gknZaZjbFRNbs82c/sZCmMifmLTiJxVc6TbmKScF08vny6B8i4ObYLkdQ3 vrtNKHwqxlexCLung+qvgN0DEMjTHYWvi2FIl6783pfZHICorkvtx8UC314GYdu4GNUf AvZQkyVlSP7KUwER3qE5bQRdGscQCrNKpPYHvYMXRfRAaet2SjrhJcGqwONo7nPBTdpS nH5ZZSw7GdnO99gcNJtP+cWEYSjGZBwRdaoI/L3d/iksnBZzPYGzDKxYVsJrZOvYvYMO iM5Q==
X-Received: by 10.182.87.167 with SMTP id az7mr8843550obb.41.1407267743944; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.20.148 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53DFC08C.90005@isode.com>
References: <53DE7FDF.2010907@isode.com> <CAF4+nEGUmH6KUdBEu1FS1N-1fwxR+g1Vzs_m55y=FQsGAyG0pg@mail.gmail.com> <53DFC08C.90005@isode.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:42:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEGMkLC7kuDw9H-SLC0jiQxpoA6=utQOTBYM8erFV0e6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/PmCBnNn2OHL3zOPPsXapkpGheIo
Cc: "draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:42:26 -0000

Hi Alexey,

These changes have been made a new version -06 has been posted.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Alexey Melnikov
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 18:16, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alexey,
>
> Hi Donald,
>
>> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Alexey Melnikov
>> <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>>>
>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
>>> may receive.
>>>
>>> Document: draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05
>>> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
>>> Review Date: 3 August 2014
>>> IETF LC End Date: 21 July 2014
>>> IESG Telechat date: 7 August 2014
>>>
>>> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
>>> [Ready with nits]
>>>
>>> Major issues: None
>>>
>>> Minor issues:
>>>
>>> Section 6.4: who allocated opcodes? I.e. is there a registry?
>>
>> These OAM OpCodes were created by and originally all under the control
>> of IEEE 802.1; however, 802.1 allocated the block of 32 OpCodes from
>> 32 to 63 to ITU-T as documented in [802.1Q]. I don't think ITU-T
>> maintains an explicit registry other than the listing of assigned
>> OpCodes out of their range that appears in [Y.1731] but I could be
>> wrong.
>>
>> Perhaps a sentence could be added to the end of Section 6.4 such as
>> "These OpCodes are from the range of values that has been allocated by
>> IEEE 802.1 [802.1Q] for control by ITU-T."
>
> I think that would be very helpful. Otherwise there is a question why there
> is no IANA registry for these and your extra sentence would address that.
>
>>> Nits:
>>>
>>> I think it would be better to say that all "Reserved" fields are set to 0
>>> by
>>> the sender and ignored by the receiver.
>>
>> I'll check with the other authors on that.
>
> Thank you.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email