Re: [Gen-art] [Detnet] Preliminary Qs for Genart review of draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases

"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com> Tue, 25 September 2018 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C74E131155; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SReOfg-Y9NLQ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BA8120072; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049287.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8PEuckA042230; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:01:59 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2mqnscmf4g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:01:56 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w8PF1XZG008652; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:01:34 -0400
Received: from zlp27128.vci.att.com (zlp27128.vci.att.com [135.66.87.50]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w8PF1SHP008435; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:01:28 -0400
Received: from zlp27128.vci.att.com (zlp27128.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp27128.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 594DD4039462; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:01:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [130.9.129.151]) by zlp27128.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id 2FC8E4039458; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:01:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.5]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.151]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:01:27 -0400
From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
To: Xavier Vilajosana <xvilajosana@worldsensing.com>, "liubingyang@huawei.com" <liubingyang@huawei.com>
CC: "Grossman, Ethan A." <eagros@dolby.com>, "resnick@episteme.net" <resnick@episteme.net>, "draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet] Preliminary Qs for Genart review of draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases
Thread-Index: AQHUVB1wNX2MMFAdI0qwFDdSTUqOLKT/84yAgAFBkYCAAB8PgP//wwjw
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:01:27 +0000
Message-ID: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C888425326@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <CA04CF35-3DB4-49B8-A8A0-3F603758299A@episteme.net> <BL0PR06MB4548550B6988002BE97A128EC4170@BL0PR06MB4548.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <C1CE72EE84AF224E94DA21AE134209EE01BF7216@DGGEMI526-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAFLuR6524J1Kp0C0rojN27hXJbGC06LqL5rn9-n8BbXSBKtRWA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFLuR6524J1Kp0C0rojN27hXJbGC06LqL5rn9-n8BbXSBKtRWA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.110]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_005_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C888425326MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-09-25_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809250149
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/OJqI1yAs4voZ0AG3ADJQCVzgLQY>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Detnet] Preliminary Qs for Genart review of draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:02:16 -0000

Hi Xavi,

Thanks for your interest in detnet!

It’s not really about the “suitability”. There are many ways a working group approaches their documents (or doing a wiki). If you are interested in requirements, you may be interested in detnet’s problem statement document which captures requirements. It is in IETF Last Call also at this time:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-problem-statement/

The other document which provides a comprehensive background is the architecture document (also in IETF Last Call):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-architecture/

Deborah
(AD for detnet)


From: Xavier Vilajosana <xvilajosana@worldsensing.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 10:33 AM
To: liubingyang@huawei.com
Cc: Grossman, Ethan A. <eagros@dolby.com>; resnick@episteme.net; draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Preliminary Qs for Genart review of draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases

Hi,

having a use case and requirements document is very important, not only for the standardization group but also for the industry and the research/academia. The document is setting the base requirements for the different verticals and creating a knowledge base that can be used in the future by researcher and developer companies to improve or create new technologies targeting a particular use case.

Not sure why there is discussion about the suitability of this document. Can someone clarify?

regards
Xavi


Xavier Vilajosana
CIO
Office:<tel:+34%20934%2018%2005%2085>[<tel:+34%20934%2018%2005%2085>+34] 93 418 0585<tel:+34%20934%2018%2005%2085>
Cell:<tel:+34%20934%2018%2005%2085>[<tel:+34%20934%2018%2005%2085>+34] 646 633 681<tel:+34%20934%2018%2005%2085>
xvilajosana@worldsensing.com
<mailto:youremail@worldsensing.com>


Missatge de Liubingyang (Bryan) <liubingyang@huawei.com<mailto:liubingyang@huawei.com>> del dia dt., 25 de set. 2018 a les 16:16:
Hi,

I support that the use case document is very useful as "requirements" for the deterministic techniques.
And may I ask why the WG decided not to have a requirement draft? Sorry if I missed some meetings or meeting minutes, but I really think a requirement document can be helpful for knowing the technique gaps and requirements

Bingyang (Bryan)

-----Original Message-----
From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Grossman, Ethan A.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:31 AM
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net<mailto:resnick@episteme.net>>; draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>; detnet@ietf.org<mailto:detnet@ietf.org>; Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Preliminary Qs for Genart review of draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases

Hi Pete,

My observation is that the DetNet WG made a decision to not have a "Requirements" draft, instead casting the Use Cases draft in that role, but in a more flexible way, i.e. the design is intended to achieve as much as can be achieved toward the "requirements" (the "least common denominator features" of those asked for in the collection of use cases) given a "reasonable" technology solution.

Thus as the DetNet design progressed, based on that model, certain features that were originally asked for in the Use Cases were eventually dropped from the Use Cases (and thus from the expectations of DetNet) when it was established that these features were not feasible given the sort of solution that we could create within the scope of DetNet (for example "it should work on the open Internet" was dropped).

I would claim that this role would justify publication, however that's just my $0.02.

Best,
Ethan (as editor of the Use Cases draft)

-----Original Message-----
From: detnet <detnet-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Pete Resnick
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 8:44 AM
To: draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>; detnet@ietf.org<mailto:detnet@ietf.org>; Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>>
Subject: [Detnet] Preliminary Qs for Genart review of draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases

Hi Lou,

I've got a preliminary question about draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases that isn't answered in the intro to the document or in your shepherd writeup.
I've Cced the WG just to make sure they're in the loop, and I've Cced the gen-art list and the responsible AD just in case Deborah or any of my Genart colleagues wish to say, "Pete, stop worrying your pretty little head and go finish your Genart review!" And I swear, I'm not asking this just to delay having to read 79 pages. (OK, maybe a little.)

What's the motivation behind publishing this document? From the intro, it looks like it's purpose was to document the use cases so that the WG could do its work. Is there a reason that it needs to be published for posterity? Will people in the future need to reference this document? It would help me to review the document if I understood why it is being published instead of simply being a tool that the WG used and now no longer needs.

I promise, in the meanwhile I'll continue to read the document and get the rest of my review finished, but I'd like to understand more about the purpose of the document.

Thanks,

pr

_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org<mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_detnet&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=0XLYP1sJJFIHEf2XW-BGRro3ezGZtv6NnV2g_UkCsQo&e=>

_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org<mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_detnet&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=0XLYP1sJJFIHEf2XW-BGRro3ezGZtv6NnV2g_UkCsQo&e=>

_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org<mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_detnet&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=0XLYP1sJJFIHEf2XW-BGRro3ezGZtv6NnV2g_UkCsQo&e=>

[Image removed by sender.]

[Image removed by sender.]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.worldsensing.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=81jJgGg1L_bH7ME__KkUg80vAFXl4OyNZjKBfCmGu5Y&e=>

[Image removed by sender.]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__es.linkedin.com_company_worldsensing-2Ds.l.n.e&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=uPpufJpJeVN3WbfdqpETfKTCaAbmjyRrgEA4cWvnwQk&e=>

[Image removed by sender.]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_worldsensing&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=pl3gRXn0gORkYL5MUjoeyu6jZvJUgS0ktSndzz1oBDg&e=>

[Image removed by sender.]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_channel_UCExBd3gO-2DZBZwz4fqOrKgWA&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=DBccmR7o_Cb2uCxa6FkMKmlHqWicmW-kKCACOIfhtb8&e=>


BARCELONA
Viriat, 47, Edificio Numancia 1, 10th floor, 08014 Barcelona, Spain

LONDON
9-10 Carlos Place, Mayfair - London W1K 3AT, United Kingdom - +44 (0) 203 807 2495


AVISO LEGAL: Este mensaje y sus archivos adjuntos van dirigidos exclusivamente a su destinatario, pudiendo contener información confidencial sometida a secreto profesional. No está permitida su comunicación, reproducción o distribución sin la autorización expresa de WORLDSENSING SL. Si usted no es el destinatario final, por favor elimínelo e infórmenos por esta vía.
PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS: De conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 de 27 de abril de 2016 (GDPR), le informamos que los datos personales y dirección de correo electrónico del interesado, serán tratados bajo la responsabilidad de WORLDSENSING SL para el envío de comunicaciones sobre nuestros productos y servicios y se conservarán mientras exista un interés mutuo para ello. Los datos no serán comunicados a terceros, salvo obligación legal. Le informamos que puede ejercer los derechos de acceso, rectificación, portabilidad y supresión de sus datos y los de limitación y oposición a su tratamiento dirigiéndose a Calle Viriat,, 47 10 - 08013 Barcelona (BARCELONA). Email: dpo@worldsensing.com<mailto:dpo@worldsensing.com>. Si considera que el tratamiento no se ajusta a la normativa vigente, podrá presentar una reclamación ante la autoridad de control en www.agpd.es<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.agpd.es&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=4Eyw77lCgVBVCRoBg31NII6-eGYrZQWEjwicFmXvXvw&e=>. Datos de contacto del DPO: dpo@worldsensing.com<mailto:dpo@worldsensing.com>

LEGAL NOTICE: This message and its attachments are addressed exclusively to the recipient, and may contain confidential information subject to professional secrecy. Forwarding or distribution of this message is not permitted without the express authorization of WORLDSENSING SL. If you are not the final recipient, please delete it and inform us by replying to this email.
DATA PROTECTION: In accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of April 27, 2016 (GDPR), we inform you that the personal data and email address of the parties included in this email will be treated under the responsibility of WORLDSENSING SL for the purpose of sending communications about our products and services. The data will be kept while there is a mutual interest for it. The data will not be communicated to third parties, except in case of legal requirement. We inform you that you may exercise the rights of access, rectification, portability and deletion of your data, as well as those of limitation and opposition to the treatment of your data by contacting us at the following address: Calle Viriat, 47 10 - 08013 Barcelona (BARCELONA) or via email to dpo@worldsensing.com<mailto:dpo@worldsensing.com>. If you believe that the treatment does not comply with current regulations, you can submit a claim to the control authority at www.agpd.es<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.agpd.es&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=zU30Vq9NoepDaClNUxTOGyfBLNnORVbl-nL2va0iKBY&s=4Eyw77lCgVBVCRoBg31NII6-eGYrZQWEjwicFmXvXvw&e=>. DPO contact details: dpo@worldsensing.com<mailto:dpo@worldsensing.com>