IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-eman-requirements-10.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 13 February 2013 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF7621F86C4 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:06:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vy-oIXXf08yn for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:06:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74E521F86BB for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1DE6jUb091635; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:06:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201302131406.r1DE6jUb091635@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Juergen Quittek <Quittek@neclab.eu>
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:40:43 GMT. <CD2DB657.6B129%quittek@neclab.eu>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:06:45 +0100
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: "draft-ietf-eman-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-eman-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-eman-requirements-10.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:06:50 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

>  > - ToC page 3 and 11 page 23: Acknowledgements -? Acknowledgments
>  
>  Well, both is possible.  I changed it as suggested.

=> it is a standard US vs UK English...

>  > - 1 page 4 and others: why Power State and not power state? I believe it
>  >  comes from a document where you imported the term from?
>  
>  The capitalized term is defined in the terminology section.  Is this OK?

=> it is OK (and a point for the RFC Editor): I just wanted to understand.

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email