Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-eman-requirements-10.txt

Juergen Quittek <Quittek@neclab.eu> Tue, 29 January 2013 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Quittek@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AAF21F890D for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:41:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EWqsen7Ep8-U for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5DB21F88EF for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0855102F82; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:41:27 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ij1O4qJ4D19n; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:41:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from METHONE.office.hd (methone.office.hd [192.168.24.54]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87A1102F84; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:41:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from DAPHNIS.office.hd ([169.254.2.175]) by METHONE.office.hd ([192.168.24.54]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:40:51 +0100
From: Juergen Quittek <Quittek@neclab.eu>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: review of draft-ietf-eman-requirements-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHN/j9gG9cvjdtq7kOozQVYKD3UcA==
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:40:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CD2DB657.6B129%quittek@neclab.eu>
In-Reply-To: <201301281541.r0SFfiZV005105@givry.fdupont.fr>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
x-originating-ip: [10.7.0.92]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1C60E51BE8302C45929EAD249ED2FFFC@office.hd>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:43:43 -0800
Cc: "draft-ietf-eman-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-eman-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-eman-requirements-10.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:41:29 -0000

Hi Francis,

Thanks a lot for the review.  Please see replies inline.

On 28.01.13 16:41, "Francis Dupont" <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> wrote:

>
>I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>
><http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
>Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>you may receive.
>
>Document: draft-ietf-eman-requirements-10.txt
>Reviewer: Francis Dupont
>Review Date: 20130125
>IETF LC End Date: 20120125
>IESG Telechat date: unknown
>
>Summary: Ready
>
>Major issues: None
>
>Minor issues: None
>
>Nits/editorial comments:
> - ToC page 2: very inconsistent use of caps: I propose to put the first
>letter
>  of all words in upper cases. And of course apply this to titles (in the
>very
>  unlikely case the ToC is not auto generated)

Fixed as proposed.

> - ToC page 3 and 11 page 23: Acknowledgements -? Acknowledgments

Well, both is possible.  I changed it as suggested.

> - 1 page 4: IT -> Information Technology

Changed. 

>
> - 1 page 4 and others: why Power State and not power state? I believe it
>  comes from a document where you imported the term from?

The capitalized term is defined in the terminology section.  Is this OK?

> - 12 pages 23 and 24: Telcommunication -> Telecommunication (twice)

Fixed, even three times.

>
> - Authors' Addresses: please use the full names of countries (surface
>mail
>  was not yet converted to ISO IS 3166 as far as I know :), so:
>   DE -> Germany
>   IN -> India (or Republic of India?)
>   BE -> Belgium

Done.  Mouli, I used India.  Is this correct or do we have to use
"Republic of India"?

Thanks,
    Juergen

>
>Regards
>
>Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr