Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Thu, 05 April 2012 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA5A21F8542 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YV-CsWByb2zb for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B75C21F850D for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57482014A; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:00:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 30D1E4766; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:01:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Tom Yu <tlyu@MIT.EDU>
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852C428E2F6D@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <ldvaa2qjky7.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:01:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <ldvaa2qjky7.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu> (Tom Yu's message of "Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:46:08 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslwr5uql32.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:01:35 -0000

My peresonal preference is to retain Recommendations as the title to
section 5.
I have no opinion on whether adding subsections would be a good idea or
not.
It's probably not worth spinning a new draft for that but if people
believe it desirable it's fine to fold in with other changes in my
opinion.
Obviously, wait for direction from our AD.