IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E025B1A8A08; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JvlouogEIk_9; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B748D1A8A41; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbgq6 with SMTP id gq6so36758940wgb.3; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=j4juTjmM1Y5SP0hWK2QfHhMkUt3E2dgdTSiqiONDeM4=; b=lTQlTjO2qJG40XUROXJjRpwdNPKg9Zuiz66qlWetLqFjoc5LPuhcR8V3Z3G7U7eaJD egUlKNM0WZg6l1W9BLH5Y1tjfhAOTm7m8eDufAqWRhpW/Kq75lyQocTjHrUI4hGGqAi0 pRZpUSy/CkEW8CGYDPIzGDzo4mG91AwFZPS6Gol18xQzERGMcHYV6MIEOvm0/5HfWG3m s7cXMzfIvYvfauoE9nkE29+dyIJokNxBMFhIbKu/sfiNOK7LXVCKxB+W8nBmenpWl0PO 06VuEWtuQK1eZHwfhNjOdNnaMMIa1BC1rNRsmgwG0yy9kCyDuEAiTvXrzoQlWrvwV3X2 V/xQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.222.230 with SMTP id qp6mr73007424wjc.70.1433432475487; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.148.148 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55629E31.2060900@gmail.com>
References: <55629E31.2060900@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:41:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH645D=-RPpJaf9TL08xUZTG3rmqa-g3KC0HoLKjZnw79Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "<lionel.morand@orange.com>" <lionel.morand@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3bad882d1c30517b301e7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/_oY1AG0irrFyY987MNNecFh-N0Q>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:41:19 -0000

Brian,

Thank you for your review.  I agree, the shepherd report should be amended
to remove the 'updates' language since the extensions are optional.

Thank you,
Kathleen

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01.txt
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review Date: 2015-05-25
> IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-01
> IESG Telechat date:
>
> Summary:  Ready
> --------
>
> Comment:
> --------
>
> This is a clear and well-written document. I do have two comments, however:
> 1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David
> Black).
> 2) The shepherd suggests in the writeup that it should formally update RFC
> 5777.
> But since it describes optional extensions to RFC 5777 that are strictly
> compatible,
> I don't think that's right.
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email