IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Thu, 11 June 2015 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F2E1B2BDF; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCBCYq6UswE5; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4D61B2BE2; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maildlpprd05.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd05.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.37]) by mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id t5BLYoKk032256 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:34:55 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com t5BLYoKk032256
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1434058495; bh=vxBVtHs8jKGixxItphxlUOCJo/Q=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=PAJf/8XtmFnSjwzg6NFBis2RN0VDgAF1hyMe+9CdofzCg/kRtlUyZiTGfUssDuBuX WXjXnXt19rwXRiHTY01BBTUurgK+ZLlMT0s42h/FSAZ0vbBT3vxjpkx/x5tszCSuDq ujzTpZiEHvBoP+bEksFcZR4Vb+ubblzmIWx2aS9w=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com t5BLYoKk032256
Received: from mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.22]) by maildlpprd05.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:34:38 -0400
Received: from mxhub28.corp.emc.com (mxhub28.corp.emc.com [10.254.110.184]) by mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id t5BLYcTA032042 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:34:40 -0400
Received: from MXHUB208.corp.emc.com (10.253.68.34) by mxhub28.corp.emc.com (10.254.110.184) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.327.1; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:32:00 -0400
Received: from MX104CL02.corp.emc.com ([169.254.8.123]) by MXHUB208.corp.emc.com ([10.253.68.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:32:00 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01
Thread-Index: AQHQlp9Ck6NaZFCdJ0O3D7vO8yUTlZ2n3DN8gAARlKA=
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:31:58 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949360B370BEE@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
References: <55629E31.2060900@gmail.com> <1AFFDF51-8787-4BD1-BC43-9C3B3D07E915@piuha.net> <5579EE93.30003@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5579EE93.30003@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.238.44.140]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/i7n32KRIkK0HG33B4gc9CUI_GhY>
Cc: "mls.ietf@gmail.com" <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes.all@ietf.org>, "spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:35:04 -0000

They already have - my comment made it into Martin's Discuss for this draft, accompanied by a supporting comment from Spencer ;-).

Thanks,
--David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 4:25 PM
> To: Jari Arkko
> Cc: mls.ietf@gmail.com; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-dime-congestion-
> flow-attributes.all@ietf.org; spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-
> flow-attributes-01
> 
> You're welcome. I hope that the Transport ADs are looking at
> David Black's comment, however.
> 
> Regards
>    Brian
> 
> On 11/06/2015 21:41, Jari Arkko wrote:
> > Thank you Brian for your review.
> >
> > Jari
> >
> > On 25 May 2015, at 06:59, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >>
> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> >> you may receive.
> >>
> >> Document: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01.txt
> >> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> >> Review Date: 2015-05-25
> >> IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-01
> >> IESG Telechat date:
> >>
> >> Summary:  Ready
> >> --------
> >>
> >> Comment:
> >> --------
> >>
> >> This is a clear and well-written document. I do have two comments, however:
> >> 1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David
> Black).
> >> 2) The shepherd suggests in the writeup that it should formally update RFC
> 5777.
> >> But since it describes optional extensions to RFC 5777 that are strictly
> compatible,
> >> I don't think that's right.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gen-art mailing list
> >> Gen-art@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email