IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 25 May 2015 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E40A1A0282; Sun, 24 May 2015 21:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vq_ga75whlGC; Sun, 24 May 2015 21:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A2A1A03A6; Sun, 24 May 2015 20:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabru16 with SMTP id ru16so62351828pab.1; Sun, 24 May 2015 20:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kPIN8PnUj5wJa5IeOmndcnCoASPA0hhV7dKM9Yt69PQ=; b=f7JqvjJ8f5oTkj1Qh1mjiLkcDR9bskvY7pSlG1e0efU0t0ZrLr1pfydFuG7v6c4qN4 bnR1nbci5Nw49iPgyR6rM72IasdRsh3LWXl11AqAx4aw8PZQp8hENGGq0jp/diJabJon fwQZRQ70szBWcGh3gF0AdfHWKp5x5sCUdYCMdLDcuFFDjqYK0QJwQkZzPAuAMfkCokEH 3atOtu/Y4RUSbnucgCcciBakrIZNkdBKjh2/6rM10uMHjjrD6PmOOQ62kCZTxKQrwD5T MvFts4h3ARoduLnTmErpo0n55gloX3QKThntvTGVgO4r6csJJT5uqfTGmUKQ0AgqqyIe AmHA==
X-Received: by 10.66.121.227 with SMTP id ln3mr36556360pab.68.1432526390312; Sun, 24 May 2015 20:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4a17:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4a17:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ho10sm8417622pbc.27.2015.05.24.20.59.47 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 May 2015 20:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55629E31.2060900@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 15:59:45 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/goJevACiV03hMn8wjzgd6m4b-hM>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 04:03:03 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-05-25
IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-01
IESG Telechat date:

Summary:  Ready
--------

Comment:
--------

This is a clear and well-written document. I do have two comments, however:
1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David Black).
2) The shepherd suggests in the writeup that it should formally update RFC 5777.
But since it describes optional extensions to RFC 5777 that are strictly compatible,
I don't think that's right.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email