[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04
Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Tue, 31 May 2016 14:58 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF4212D5DE for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 07:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id haJ4U8f6qaZx for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 07:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0767.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::767]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7715212D5CB for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 07:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Zpncpr6LmCId4q4MJdmh5qcknn3mr30D3HOsag4Cr9o=; b=bP1Ba85B0tY3DaLTjj/N4XnP5GxhONmNqXX1KD/jMrVPZnOE4zW15w7EZF68AbaybiEwY6A35iIugBSV19IGf4EIVutwAfa4dwWEFrf4PShhRGRXg45y7MF+DPU0PidsMXt2Oh112l4SItMlj87vMmg5cHK/hbCoDzRBjq/aCeM=
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1987.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.506.9; Tue, 31 May 2016 14:58:09 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0506.013; Tue, 31 May 2016 14:58:09 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04
Thread-Index: AdG7S4L70ys4Yv8mRB6lVHhfCVgHgg==
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 14:58:09 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB19859A204D0BEE5773AF0B32AE460@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f9b5c5fd-f767-4550-378b-08d38963fb2b
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1987; 5:qDPlXb3/I1gGxLsGcV4ll3H6S322I7xgKgUAvxz1ZBA3iExpo7jxpjDx024TFsgzbCR+HZWhLsHL3i3VMtRtlHv5tCSmNps1J0QGMfOdfcIJ0Ojwwo5pGmElNaHeHkBAoSLR9vqfCSkDPUsOkN5sXg==; 24:DDzywvRF2o07saK5uGC3BwncjZdnfiKLVKCZLHVSWH7FkM/Hb0S4o4oNDzTZBE3vH6FEx1vR+D4kwFVaDZavyjHw3bIwoA/w1+klcFK4Y+I=; 7:7k1iWzWtmn2UW/DkVdW7PvCFoyJAOtMYwcqVtcRLCcuMrB/IuOpQp6ms92lk8MawYzV6I2wCDWp4TXzcsWRIyogOTcpMJB1jdzIt6MfXwW90TxmuSbmsaLUtSm0Sx3CW+RP5iho+1Q37CI8C8qUXFi8s/tP9NHmjo8mXkfTfRDHiCpZd9XVlRSsvFcx+UYvj
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1987;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB19870E80B7DC1C578DEBE501AE460@BLUPR05MB1987.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1987; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1987;
x-forefront-prvs: 095972DF2F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377424004)(37854004)(2900100001)(5004730100002)(66066001)(74316001)(5008740100001)(87936001)(8676002)(77096005)(9686002)(81166006)(19580395003)(2501003)(3280700002)(3660700001)(15975445007)(122556002)(11100500001)(8936002)(92566002)(450100001)(99286002)(107886002)(5003600100002)(102836003)(586003)(6116002)(3846002)(33656002)(2906002)(230783001)(229853001)(5001770100001)(10400500002)(76576001)(5002640100001)(189998001)(86362001)(54356999)(50986999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1987; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 May 2016 14:58:09.6959 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1987
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ixvouuCdu_UwVneAYq5o1Zqh2oY>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 14:58:32 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04
Reviewer: Ron Bonica
Review Date: 2016-05-31
IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-08
IETF Telechat Date: 2016-06-08
Summary: RFC 4328 and RFC 7139 provide Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) signaling extensions to control the full set
of Optical Transport Network (OTN) features. However, these specifications do not cover the additional Optical channel Data
Unit (ODU) containers defined in G.Sup43 (ODU1e, ODU3e1 and ODU3e2). This document defines new signal types for these additional containers.
Major Issues: I think that we are ready for publication. But can someone confirm that it is OK to update the registry from an INFORMATIONAL RFC? I think that it is, because the registry policy is:
Standards Action for Standards Track documents, Specification Required for other documents
Minor Issues: None
Editorial Issues: None
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-… Jari Arkko
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-addi… Ronald Bonica