Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema-14.txt

Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it> Tue, 31 May 2016 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <spromano@unina.it>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42FA12B049 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sRxymHrokWgj for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brc2.unina.it (brc2.unina.it [192.132.34.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7246E12D0AB for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1464733620-05f27567b139ed0001-nPVVhF
Received: from smtp2.unina.it (smtp2.unina.it [192.132.34.62]) by brc2.unina.it with ESMTP id FdBKEyrbO6epCb3g (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:27:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: spromano@unina.it
X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 192.132.34.62
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.70.36.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4VMPvZO019594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 00:27:00 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AB6C199F-425A-4CB9-81CD-E12C781CE809"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it>
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: review of draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema-14.txt
In-Reply-To: <201605301309.u4UD9opN029703@givry.fdupont.fr>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:26:59 +0200
Message-Id: <1D5CB316-685A-4B28-8887-0D741A1A505C@unina.it>
References: <201605301309.u4UD9opN029703@givry.fdupont.fr>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp2.unina.it[192.132.34.62]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1464733620
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA
X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.132.34.42:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at unina.it
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO, HTML_MESSAGE
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.30065 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO Envelope rcpt doesn't match header 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/m7kSYNFs-yDxcumCBzjGGV2iZoA>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema-14.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 22:27:08 -0000

Hello Francis,

let us thank you for your comments! Please find below (preceded by [spromano]) our answers.

> Document: draft-ietf-clue-data-model-schema-14.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 20160525
> IETF LC End Date: 20160523
> IESG Telechat date: 20160602
> 
> Summary: Ready with nits
> 
> Major issues: none
> 
> Minor issues: none
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - I first had a concern about the CLUE abbrev (abbrevs which are not
>  "well known" according to the RFC Editor's list requires expansion
>   at their first use in the Abstract and in the body, i.e., likely
>   the introduction) but in fact CLUE is not an abbrev but a nickname.
>   I strongly suggest to this (i.e., it is not really an abbrev) in
>   the introduction (1 page 4) with an explicit reference to the
>   framework document where are details. BTW IMHO:
>    * you can leave the CLUE name in the title and the abstract
>    * this recommendation should apply to all CLUE documents
>     (at the exception of the framework one of course)

[spromano] Done. We added the following sentence to the introduction:

************************************************************************
For the benefit of the reader, the term 'CLUE' stands for 
"ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence" and is the name of 
the IETF working group in which this document, as well asother companion 
documents has been developed. A thorough definition of the CLUE
framework can be found in <xref target="I-D.ietf-clue-framework”/>

************************************************************************

> 
> - ToC page 3 and 16.3 page 48: use " vs ' around application/clue_info+xml
>  (for consistency)
> 

[spromano] Done.

> - 3 page 5: Scene.. -> Scene.

[spromano] Done.

> 
> - 3 page 5: E.g. -> E.g.,

[spromano] Done.

> - 3 page 6: e.g. -> e.g.,

[spromano] Done.

> - 4 page 7 (people): (Section 11.29). -> (Section 11.29)
>  (for consistency)

[spromano] Done.

> - 4 page 13 (multiple): sensitivyPattern* -> sensitivityPattern*

[spromano] Done.

> - 11.16 page 28: highly-dinamic -> highly-dynamic

[spromano] Done.

> - 11.27.3 page 39: simultanous -> simultaneous

[spromano] Done.

> - 15 page 46: captures , capture -> captures, capture

[spromano] We did not find this one.

> - 17 page 54 and 18 pages 61, 63 and 64 : Soundlevel -> SoundLevel

[spromano] Done

> - 30 page 70: AD -> Area Director

[spromano] Done

> - 31 pages 70 to 72: usually normative references are before informative
>  references. I don't know if it is a strong requirement but if it is
>  easy for you to swap 31.1 with 31.2 it will at least follow
>  the "least astonishment" rule…

[spromano] Done

> Note I didn't check the xml stuff itself (there are automatic tools
> for this not-for-human task).

[spromano] Right!

Thanks 1k for your review,

Simon and Roberta


> 
> Regards
> 
> Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
> 

                     					       _\\|//_
                           				      ( O-O )
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o00~~(_)~~00o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    				Simon Pietro Romano
             				 Universita' di Napoli Federico II
                		     Computer Engineering Department 
	             Phone: +39 081 7683823 -- Fax: +39 081 7683816
                                           e-mail: spromano@unina.it

		    <<Molti mi dicono che lo scoraggiamento è l'alibi degli 
		    idioti. Ci rifletto un istante; e mi scoraggio>>. Magritte.
               			                     oooO
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(   )~~~ Oooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
					                 \ (            (   )
			                                  \_)          ) /
                                                                       (_/