IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-03.txt

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Fri, 10 July 2015 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12641A90B3 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnF3Etf0_w1q for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2735F1A1BDE for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A00788151; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brians-mbp.jhuapl.edu (swifi-nat.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B46F1369284; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 05:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Dushyant Raghuvanshi (draghuva)" <draghuva@cisco.com>, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
References: <201507061346.t66DkLaY070724@givry.fdupont.fr> <D1C40BB7.46F91%draghuva@cisco.com>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <559FB86F.2020806@innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:19:59 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D1C40BB7.46F91%draghuva@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7e3hwmx6dT3dJJTMNfrKQCqVnvb1UMfF7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/mIPiaxBNdV8tvetHH58Mp8h7Ngw>
Cc: "draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:19:59 -0000


On 7/9/15 2:08 AM, Dushyant Raghuvanshi (draghuva) wrote:

>> - 10 page 26: there is a new security mechanism proposed for DHCPv6,
>>  secure DHCPv6. As it is clearly designed for UDP transport I don't
>>  believe it interferes with the document so IMHO you can safely ignore
>> it.
> 
> [Dushyant]: Secure DHCPv6 isn’t a standard yet. Can we use that as
> reference?
> 

I don't see a reason to reference the sedhcpv6 draft.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email