IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Messages from the gendispatch list for the week ending Sun Apr 11 06:00:06 2021

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 14 April 2021 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CD63A236B for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQjrHUlEUu_4 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE7EF3A2365 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id k25so22312676iob.6 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1a1i47Qb4g5Xe7fWfU0R5xlGoA2KGsfppK89Pwc28Rg=; b=qN6B/UeTRxFfXfzXEp0u9faIjx7hHUSZV7BQnbmEYeSjUinUauzGRHyRZpReyx1QIG bASjE0TxJynvw5Z3lg0ILet5Jegt/vYjYkixCrp1XsGivIiUDNaJuFqjUCvQka2NKSU0 ipCgr77ZE9Q3PauJbj1Ss8I9MXUUDaGlzeZd68J6e6YmZsabTUsOAdG8+Z42uwH539xP qb8clM/Va18u5EQy8q6cD6JMFaxPlcwmJIfX3+R2haVW2VpWnZRIi0e6U0QCK2jPjHq3 iki7t7Ede8id6Znn1kCoFNU4sJnNlTmII1hwMb6INOV/xzG8q/8F3+pqKvxFbDwrEVuh pBYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1a1i47Qb4g5Xe7fWfU0R5xlGoA2KGsfppK89Pwc28Rg=; b=CQkeqq+3DmZgMn7eOzTXgvMpMefQVD7dfZ3J+g0u5ORKbxWnjRQO8fYjSSgOgQuUAP h68vi646NBExtxeA+Ae+Xb97iR5XPjciTUz53HPKS2xQXYWUP9II4FanWQwwCegTd84o nFLUlDLbOuivRscBQD6sL/bRXghSvLcHljjoKApg5XCzTWTsjwjySJs+RhH9WOgax8mY PaKD+LtRESwUo42guDD198fCrKdeBGLYGqP7FdBSs9pGW1r2Vai5LNrie+Ns/NF1tZTD bK51X/69QOuZTZrBjDphR7uXovZstuyg0NC3NGHTkVuCShFK4kkRCJTFDvFSWF+jOfar zE5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PK5Y1qMsQaVmfcdZd42Fday/xl453SHFhZrUv+xKceSROgpu3 FCiZ0TPzcPxJEfjIkygYZR+XQ8025/PA30kQPBg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMVnDtZTATnMCvKyJMUdeRCO4fHC5ZulGpDgpJHuEjfLoAn1Tg/20Cuy3Vr4Kbhu8RmzTbpuckzbahnfUOZag=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:d4e:: with SMTP id d14mr224834jak.103.1618440956212; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210411095943.94541.qmail@submit.iecc.com> <7BFD0381-6280-4C9D-9887-48B4572684DA@episteme.net> <CAChr6Sy+W3u4pEtj4YXHpgseVQyssKGxgO==JRvH5c07bqbzow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sy+W3u4pEtj4YXHpgseVQyssKGxgO==JRvH5c07bqbzow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:55:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SzZgm9Zq08khBos83dF9z-yVsK72NbHBmDpw8ceb1cGfQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048f7a105bff6a6e0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/2mKdyPCLIfWGh8KLGGj72rxciiY>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Messages from the gendispatch list for the week ending Sun Apr 11 06:00:06 2021
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 22:56:03 -0000

I also found the recent traffic on the IETF general list instructive. I
think those that participated feel that anonymous comments on a NY Times
article represent something one can determine consensus from, or at least
something substantive to argue about.

To me, it shows that the IETF list should not be given the deference it is
now (as suggested in other drafts).

thanks,
Rob


On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 9:16 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This exchange is actually kind of helpful. I think I might add
> "self-appointed stats keeper" messages to the list of unwelcome messages in
> my draft. If a community decides they want those messages, that's fine too.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:47 AM Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
> wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> You were requested last Augst not to post these to the gendispatch list.
>> What caused it to be sent again?
>>
>> pr
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
>> All connections to the world are tenuous at best
>>
>> --
>> Gendispatch mailing list
>> Gendispatch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email