IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] agenda for gendispatch at ietf116

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Sun, 26 March 2023 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF41C15154D for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 20:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uabi_K9Md4G7 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 20:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 418D8C1516E2 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 20:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-80de.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.128.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C241208AB; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 06:17:16 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 12:17:07 +0900
Message-Id: <8407FC6E-8A5F-4B03-A83D-2513BFB8698F@eggert.org>
References: <CAChr6SzaRiooo+qPxrepsuUKtxHk40Hfu2=4L_57ojkrbcRzpw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SzaRiooo+qPxrepsuUKtxHk40Hfu2=4L_57ojkrbcRzpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 6C241208AB.A7422
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/9zczahs1HlF6N7_BgDxlpq_9Kjo>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] agenda for gendispatch at ietf116
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 03:17:50 -0000

On 26. Mar 2023, at 11:45, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am all for procedural backflips and tolerance, but this one has already been declined, right?

I declined the BOF request only because it came in much too late, and not for any other reason. I suggested to the proponents to consider taking the discussion to GENDISPATCH if they wanted a slot at 116.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email