Re: [Gendispatch] agenda for gendispatch at ietf116

[Rob Sayre <[e-mail]>]

There seems to be some confusion, so here's the link:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-salz-re-examining-the-iesg-and-iab/

My opinion is that this text is not worth discussing, and it's definitely
not worth debating whether it is a document or "slides".

I would say it is not worth addressing, so dispatch to nowhere, in case
that was not clear.

Others may wish to take up this work.

thanks,
Rob

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 3:02 PM Rob Sayre <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 6:07 PM Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> It'd help me if Rich or some other proponent were able
>> to indicate the kind of success outcome they'd like to
>> see.
>>
>
> - Re-Examining the IESG and IAB (20 min)
>
> This draft does raise concrete objections. I do not think they have merit,
> but they are stated clearly.
>
> However, the draft is almost entirely written in the passive voice.
>
> - "The community has heard grumblings from ADs..."
> - "The AD job is described as being very difficult..."
> - "The AD job is described as time-consuming..."
> - "The IAB is often labelled the 'IESG retirement home.'"
>
> So, I'm not sure who has these objections.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>
>