Re: [Gendispatch] Thoughts on draft-carpenter-gendispatch-draft-adoption

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 23 July 2020 05:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3C93A0C7D for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=huz7xKn+; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=t7oFbEHg
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXvnAohg4tJT for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE7B3A0C7C for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EE55C0092 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:07:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=SW8euDSUnbCi1b06QedR+Sirrcum9ST BfRuA/gTwMMI=; b=huz7xKn+Cvl6n8O+XNssGH5fQ84cScY4BmtWIQ/Khe/0bWT VxF1QKR8B9wUp/tXL3DBsAZzwfknkQk7rxAPUG6O9JE4YGQlopKEbFAfpUhl75vN pSA9dVwYc11qGpL9mil8oTE8UiMAEGN1LPuUZ/SwAA7Ryj0jFPQFNT/fM/xP7wTp z80AGCmh/Bcxf34OCDuPBm+zuW2t/5FYBu1lTUSvht3aoPYTb5agWOF9mcmHa+r5 kFKS7dkPcywTotQK67r044CNdrwQFvOYcZ6QE8d+7rWbLLn61E4IoRCWfTkHkk3d y+QhwavMcEPCfpueKKmPWq+UnpfPayV1nbCR4Gw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=SW8euD SUnbCi1b06QedR+Sirrcum9STBfRuA/gTwMMI=; b=t7oFbEHgpR2zzAA2TfQj1e qGkK0cwsx2EVm/WQLONb6I2DH0Ta8YWDwM56YL1bi2yS/HNwv5E8uu9umetjZYek utC9dGtOT734ceTlldnAwNOk4iwpNR3xnlRdxeE1vLOLUyy/yAdNIeprki6QlFkK oJEpH+l5q4jz2GyC0Ec6I8PEjB5mmKNyEx6UKgZbKkHQ4ngAj3UaU7R8+upJsK2E JBafAvkRaTcW2u6EekcsIBrhnTcm9kFezXpNZ2BAlaciLDD4UYfRH9JAqkEVkp99 mzjXvPlVHJEFDJ5FuK5sWRcoRhPGXRrYF7x9S1PQQb5/SJABDeaFvXEawUr0/IfQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:CBsZXzNjXu4Isde4xi3DYwgj-61vWto7CZG-_TV_YYnJRHigg_5FqA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrhedtgdelfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheefteduudduhedtkefhvd fhteelffdujeegjeffheffveekudeigfeuveekfeelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:CBsZX98qSkB2adPnXIey6H9BF4USRg3x1xzDvOjsFBrWOpUDJJWDdQ> <xmx:CBsZXyTzDOFK_jtxGfyM0XvpLLR1r7hqPVmHSQNMCtC0RP1dsIXhNg> <xmx:CBsZX3tKCRc-az3sK_5Roa-_Xe8Wc1_iomiWCWpkUyUNUJdxamA3Fw> <xmx:CBsZX-9Bkv9rpMQbC4b3u4itcKxXruoT1KjUPeA8K7dPeT6V9goxZA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 98F44E00A8; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-92-g11c785d-fm-20200721.004-g11c785d5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <62184213-6fae-474b-a23e-1a4ca18721da@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4bdff8f8-c0fd-c928-8a4a-bed420d7858c@gmail.com>
References: <031601d65fb0$f6aa0a30$e3fe1e90$@olddog.co.uk> <22930.1595383098@localhost> <4ddb8984-2754-374f-5aac-5bdc70167792@nostrum.com> <4bdff8f8-c0fd-c928-8a4a-bed420d7858c@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:06:59 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/TBktC5wQadMr9cYsjzEfLzgFzds>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Thoughts on draft-carpenter-gendispatch-draft-adoption
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 05:07:23 -0000

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020, at 10:28, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> True.  I'm thinking that the main point is that a formally appointed
> DT (not an informal self-starting DT) can reasonably *expect* their
> output to be adopted, but cannot assume it.

There might be an assumption here, and I'm sure that in most cases a draft that is the product of a formalized DT will be adopted.  But it's a bad assumption.

The only true measure here is that the WG has consensus to adopt.  I'm surprised that the draft doesn't put that up front.  It's there, but buried.  Given that this is the yardstick that has been uniformly used - at least in my experience - I think it would be remiss not to mention it.

BTW, I think that the general concept is fine, just not this DT point.