IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft-kucherawy-bcp97bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 17 August 2022 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7103C1522DD for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z-pY5nrOefyt for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D882C14F6E7 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a7so25566942ejp.2 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=G/thl5tsipRGAO1yqFCO+jjhfslc7rTim3GVBFJ2dx8=; b=Ku6kn2nfpftFyXiOYAGMiRPxXpJO56kwhjUveEjjmpNLJkvFtXeuMHRgD3k2q5FTOS bXNkz/ZmmXueyIBf83uAzYiylbfLTtPuvSauHD2NDeneBcXH0yWa5Z8Kn13S7+NaTeWx sl2LYLfRfcDmIwtwUm6DjECcYywBE+Rbi+GrPVZf3Ucbwb/brMufXVrRAN6AOpObRgR6 c/pGBddirU1pKIAbzsaPocvGq9p5+4rlkb81We82CcRE68d5KqJ5zAIva66F4wWllV8/ Bu5CgmXSHmEpXk7g5ikikKU3BDBILVnZm5iqG/m77JBQG8givkxhkWfb1hwH4yF9O8zq DH+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=G/thl5tsipRGAO1yqFCO+jjhfslc7rTim3GVBFJ2dx8=; b=tlr3nkU3u6gUV603OvxJIgdBpYz3TpOsbMQq5x8XLXsbiRy9GcmSwudlaSJ+/dvyig CX7/5eN0z5/huJT9ywk5Cxek5bIhtzONQzgwiq5aIrvsX3wTKErtnVy8n+fUJEibQjOl XEqt7BZAAtS1YqIibnC1Y/ipZF7VWaYBYpIE4+OeEjnb8dPLslDD7/lyV7NOWxYurny0 U5xjlkBWlhpZuJYNPYviLpwzK02XodXcT4ry2Yfl0TnVCzhgNq3st4tn4sQ2A97z5WwL T/sDtaJDfGa71yKo49hN89WzIlZ2JOGDtEeKzYx8lxVFKKA+FtcrsSkuRPn8qh04wb4w 0PbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1ZZilqQN8SrvgyRg4IN4JLpSV8135gYzftL3sDc+o0V+c1KR4Y fKG+MYbnIhJLmZrCRM32/Xr8w9aWMdzNZo7je+LpDzUuCUE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR643nJG/IhPiV4NaX3U9ByMLyNqJ57mnOPoZjxpMgEG+BxZgTQvcH2rSVepsHeNXVZjnHfdcP+VREKnuzWuZG8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2856:b0:730:882d:a0fb with SMTP id el22-20020a170907285600b00730882da0fbmr17134228ejc.252.1660754505678; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbpuvCLF68jdW-3ZDa4eACSSrVEyPDpyR9=GBoWFtT+1w@mail.gmail.com> <11f201d8ab0b$53fd5190$fbf7f4b0$@olddog.co.uk> <1501eb83-0260-4681-d1c9-6e2173b8f833@gmail.com> <CAChr6SxQK4rRhp-K-CEbZge=ow5mPpFa+wokJXkDtKuoTt9njQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC9wnY-hfqOXYr4Nke9OVf8Eyc3OVw_y2yyRpBWFgPmBQA4aLQ@mail.gmail.com> <940a5cc7-0ac7-8f73-39db-43d012b7bef5@network-heretics.com> <7b89642d-02b1-329f-52ab-c41d421b9bfd@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <7b89642d-02b1-329f-52ab-c41d421b9bfd@network-heretics.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:41:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwanzqVkYZidM8T6L-rwEGChCZ+zeHZww5=sCyQL3_u=4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005ec3a305e6728aac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/fiorMsMNKFNZyFpwCKAw3Dokl3E>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-kucherawy-bcp97bis
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:41:47 -0000

I did start this discussion there, and the original thread can be found
there.  One participant was adamant that this should be sent through a
DISPATCH group to confirm that AD-sponsorship was appropriate.  If that's
the outcome, then that's on the record rather than being an ad hoc choice,
and we can proceed.

Alongside that, any further feedback on what the document currently says is
welcome.

-MSK


On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:34 PM Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
wrote:

> Postscript: this is actually something that would have once been
> reasonable to discuss on the ietf@ list.   IMO it should still be
> reasonable to hold such discussions there.
>
> Keith
>
> On 8/15/22 15:30, Keith Moore wrote:
> > I think this work needs to be done somehow, even if it's mostly going
> > to be a chore rather than something that people get excited about.   I
> > don't have a problem with AD sponsorship of this draft, and spinning
> > up a separate WG seems unnecessarily cumbersome.
> >
> > Keith
> >
> > On 8/15/22 04:25, Kirsty Paine wrote:
> >> Hi gendispatchers,
> >>
> >> I'm seeing weak support for continued AD-sponsorship of this draft.
> >> Please raise any strong objections or endorsements for that summary
> >> and path forward, ideally in the next fortnight.
> >>
> >> On dispatching process: if a topic generates lots of discussion,
> >> seems controversial or raises strong multi-party disagreements on
> >> paths forward, then we need agenda time to discuss more thoroughly.
> >> However, if it doesn't (and so far, it seems it does not), I'm happy
> >> to pass this through via mailing list consensus when stretched over a
> >> long period (multiple weeks), as it provides ample opportunity for
> >> the community to object or endorse.
> >>
> >> Therefore, please share your views in the next fortnight...
> >>
> >> Kirsty
> >>
>
> --
> Gendispatch mailing list
> Gendispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email