Re: [Geojson] Requests for comments on GeoJSON Events draft

Carl Reed <carl.n.reed@gmail.com> Wed, 04 January 2017 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <carl.n.reed@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geojson@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geojson@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300A31296CF for <geojson@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:29:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDxMf2HIVLyN for <geojson@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:29:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F5F21296BF for <geojson@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:29:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 3so370138249oih.1 for <geojson@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:29:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Um4QWYUF6dEOgSfxtO4X952iouK4w61DOmg4U2HUWKw=; b=AsUTAIZbH7NPGAfQPr9uidFHantu7PMkM3qztUeYkp/jX0gsy8E4TckYorf5APHohD qRRmII7mO4h5TcfWytkmZ2TYVawGjGYq+uta1FqC0IkwxPKrY5p4dtdawOk1ZgBSIoG4 OlsaAJa39YOEtAmAPcy+4vhHKSGchzu59KcLMoNAhBfReGcgaP955zzdfeoSpqKLHz9s HEpIalhZJk1rlrOu2nWMs8VDUvs9Ym3Cm0cRlhko6nH90m41h32ssvitXTWB8YS96eq9 Xvn+8SboBtNeGwKm4VKOd6ilY9M8OD7qtm637KoGoJLJjr8rnyPPbyiDSpvIfqp1wH0y Gw7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Um4QWYUF6dEOgSfxtO4X952iouK4w61DOmg4U2HUWKw=; b=XAIzfg+7Reqse4IO+JSUT4NUotn3IljynV4eGcwiXvjsX6z4HX3kbna/K1C8McPsqh 3C6Xny0ztqNLiDnjGzEjKxcJTI9nXDtNI5WqgqYdXAROIahm1PiANhM11OdnC1tw58w+ KkgMM/yMGGHgPYWAezegTa2hTYSV7Xupy3EfaAzpejhYhG3ZliLzKaznWYejgVT+u7dv Av/VNU06N4JBipl1jN/A8XAaMhweB2z1h00iUaCpK2u07BsIKaX+nR6p3EqBHn9nZKVb PMqNiKqNCaUC7ksr41FZDjj7WPHkdyyxnx668D3LxKXOEwYG4xVXg5W3tKR5IEb01zBD QdIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKTjt1IcsBRGZdqnnt2m0kSp1Fgvg0KuXeXgmiL4QvgX016jeHSh65JamsIObQQ/7xRkegsIik6TZPPvA==
X-Received: by 10.202.75.209 with SMTP id y200mr26553487oia.114.1483554586789; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:29:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.35.98 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:29:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOodmJomw-0VymQYyPHLCR+Ds+dpEmFe=2j+FnZGh19bf1DUbg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOodmJomw-0VymQYyPHLCR+Ds+dpEmFe=2j+FnZGh19bf1DUbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Carl Reed <carl.n.reed@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:29:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcQiLeWfdhEjAC-Jr6LY+9b3XLWAn1AvNkdE04y_MbDAUD9Rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Gillies <sean.gillies@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134e21c268cd9054548f8b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geojson/OznVqYQA21KTexBPsA_93IY7nds>
Cc: "geojson@ietf.org" <geojson@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geojson] Requests for comments on GeoJSON Events draft
X-BeenThere: geojson@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF GeoJSON WG <geojson.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geojson>, <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/geojson/>
List-Post: <mailto:geojson@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geojson>, <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:29:49 -0000

Sean
Just a quick thought. Have you looked at the OGC work on moving features,
time, and temporal models/encodings? Perhaps more than necessary but the
OFF work is being designed to meet the requirements of the hydro, met,
oceans and other communities. Also from what I know of existing RFCs that
deal with location and time: they all use 8601as the foundation. As I am
travelling this is all I can contribute until next week.
Thanks
Carl


uary 4, 2017, Sean Gillies <sean.gillies@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi and Bonne Année all,
>
> With help from many of you, I've been working on a GeoJSON extension for
> event-like features
>
>     https://github.com/sgillies/geojson-events
>
> and have drafted a spec:
>
>     https://sgillies.github.io/geojson-events/draft-gillies-
> geojson-events.html
>     https://sgillies.github.io/geojson-events/
>
> It's pared down dramatically from what we discussed in the past. Fuzzy
> time periods are out and so are temporal bounding boxes because the use
> cases for these are rare. GeoJSON has been doing well so far without any
> representation of fuzzy geometry and I think the situation is about the
> same for time.
>
> I received an suggestion to consider ISO 8601 style time intervals. This
> would allow a single string value to represent an instant or interval,
>
>     "when": "2017-01-04/2017-01-05"
>
> instead of
>
>     "when": {"start": "2017-01-04", "stop": "2017-01-05"}
>
> but this seems harder to use because support for it in parsers is rare.
>
> I was asked about recurring intervals like "every other Friday," but I
> think this isn't necessary. GeoJSON doesn't have a concept of non-literal
> geometries either.
>
> Some time ago we arrived at rough consensus that "moving objects" and
> "event-like features" are either different things or very different models
> of the same things. Moving objects are not specified in my draft.
>
> I have two objectives for this draft:
>
> * To establish a common representation for time in GeoJSON that mappers of
> events, whether they are scientists or journalists or historians, can share.
> * To set an example for other extension projects.
>
> I'd love comments on how it can be improved to better meet those
> objectives. Thanks!
>
> --
> Sean Gillies
>


-- 
Carl Reed, PhD
Carl Reed and Associates

Mobile: 970-402-0284

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know
peace." Jimi Hendrix