IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Geopriv] HELD using XCAP wrt Common Policy/Geolocation Policy

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Mon, 21 September 2009 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28293A67B2 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lvmo7FD0bifi for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F010528C1C3 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AksFAL9ft0qrR7O6/2dsb2JhbACIKLJliFABjlAFhBs
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,425,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="191045113"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2009 18:13:52 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8LIDnAv016259; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:13:49 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8LIDnlE012868; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:13:49 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:13:49 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com ([10.89.0.47]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:13:48 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:13:46 -0500
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>, "ext Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4501B2E682@FIESEXC015.nsn-in tra.net>
References: <4AB6D17C.3010109@bbn.com> <024201ca3a82$a6b8f860$b34ba20a@nsnintra.net> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF10650E9C3@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4501B2E682@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-2122m9lHiu300000508@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Sep 2009 18:13:49.0074 (UTC) FILETIME=[44457720:01CA3AE7]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=969; t=1253556829; x=1254420829; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:=20HELD=20using=20XCAP=20wrt=20Common=20Policy/Geo location=20Policy |Sender:=20; bh=/ww7WTcBd1ILsK4zrnlisVYqDh+5Z96k2cNQ8FTKwHE=; b=JsvL0EvdupLUJkm/TZLMLNr0Xv2U5HEkPFxVdvy1ln0mxY77dJh5Bn9QND /9MTiu1walpNbMw2jdXX5Xn7xmEzezCpqCPKlVpEsOvuceAquY6aNPFiQe12 X60ukXxu0L;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Subject: [Geopriv] HELD using XCAP wrt Common Policy/Geolocation Policy
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:12:51 -0000

At 02:27 AM 9/21/2009, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>I could imagine that adding the ability to upload Common
>Policy/Geolocation Policy as an add-on to
>draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-context-04.txt is a lot easier than
>using XCAP, particularly since I believe that 95% of the cases will only
>make usage of a fraction of Common Policy (and nothing from the
>geolocation policy document).

I'm trying to figure out what is being said here in Hannes' paragraph above.

Is HELD really not needing Common Policy/Geolocation Policy because 
it has another ID specifying some other mechanism?

If so, why would this WG allow this?

Common Policy is supposed to be "common" to everything, right?

Geolocation Policy is supposed to be used by everything Geopriv 
specific, right?

It appears the net result of this - if true - is that DHCP has to 
jump through hoops that HELD doesn't, even though HELD can.

James


>Ciao
>Hannes

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email