Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)

"George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com> Wed, 21 November 2012 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.george@twcable.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218AE21F8683 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:31:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x59a+y+GXRJL for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:31:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cdpipgw02.twcable.com (cdpipgw02.twcable.com [165.237.59.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429C221F867D for <grow@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:31:44 -0800 (PST)
X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.11
X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,293,1352091600"; d="scan'208";a="455851055"
Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB02.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.11]) by cdpipgw02.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 21 Nov 2012 10:31:26 -0500
Received: from PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.79]) by PRVPEXHUB02.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.11]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:31:42 -0500
From: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:31:48 -0500
Thread-Topic: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)
Thread-Index: Ac3CuG5UCckNui7iQu+7OliPSsiyfgFRJJbg
Message-ID: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD592303385FBC8B@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com>
References: <CAL9jLabt0S98HEygsQp=a98ARwiRxJ2x3F2=H5w-pDRbyqWE7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabt0S98HEygsQp=a98ARwiRxJ2x3F2=H5w-pDRbyqWE7A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:31:45 -0000

Yes, please. While I'm not certain it's complete in its current form, it's definitely a good platform for the discussion that *needs* to happen about it.

Thanks,

Wes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: grow-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:grow-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Christopher Morrow
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 5:36 PM
> To: grow-ads@tools.ietf.org; grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org; grow@ietf.org
> grow@ietf.org; draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-
> considerations@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-
> considerations (END: 11/28/2012)
>
> Grow Folks,
> the authors of:  draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations
>   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-
> considerations-01>
>
> have asked if their work is appropriate for the GROW-wg, could we take
> the next 14 days (ending Nov 28, 2012) to think/discuss this draft and
> it's efficacy to work in the GROW arena? The abstract of the draft is:
>   "The purpose of this document is to catalog past issues influencing
>    the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRR) for inter-domain
>    routing policy specification and application in the global routing
>    system over the past two decades.  Additionally, it provides a
>    discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in
>    practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer
>    applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based
>    filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day."
>
> Thanks!
> -Chris
> (co-chair)
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.