Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)

Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com> Tue, 04 December 2012 03:54 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A441F0C59 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:54:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qjFsq4YBG3n3 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com (mail-ea0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6049821F88E8 for <grow@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a1so1575621eaa.31 for <grow@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:54:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+Ex+pD9D9EFugC2w5K9k7V2uviqQvXSW+JI17BNEi7E=; b=YIx1LDE3sZ2oitSLuz9jytEH/RUTIMcviJY9t4X1TcfrnalWZWCHV9tIiBU/0AlZbO m8LQTj85X0M6GioaqbhRu9gPDx3RmtI1tzUOuuUPJNxISnkUTgjcmRr1uI41dqrWzw0O r7edSzuINnnUCiOkNOblOh2pvhj4+w/Wi3Ch/0qtOh7nqwXOKIiRlotfCovyAFJ2YmgS /c6WYSd87jVS6Nchq0mVWsxLO6Bm29IULhOJQN7Itp1BMpPrUDqWZ5o12I8ci+fEVjsm GG5DdoP9ORM18D4JUbswXbbEIwFBzrX36/JPKeDLmPxQv/CNG5I7bzLjFs+7jvF+ku28 NFIg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.184.131 with SMTP id s3mr43560804eem.38.1354593263273; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.177.5 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:54:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabt0S98HEygsQp=a98ARwiRxJ2x3F2=H5w-pDRbyqWE7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL9jLabt0S98HEygsQp=a98ARwiRxJ2x3F2=H5w-pDRbyqWE7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:54:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaYVQWabTzRKqLZ5dKT4t7NqxgFM-zutgiXe+MJDcHTz5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
To: grow-ads@tools.ietf.org, grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org, "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:54:25 -0000

howdy... a few days late, but in the end there was some support for
adopting it, and at least no non-support for it.

Could the authors spin a re-titled draft and hopefully they are
incorporating comments/etc as well?

thanks!
-chris

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Christopher Morrow
<christopher.morrow@gmail.com> wrote:
> Grow Folks,
> the authors of:  draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations
>   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations-01>
>
> have asked if their work is appropriate for the GROW-wg, could we take
> the next 14 days (ending Nov 28, 2012) to think/discuss this draft and
> it's efficacy to work in the GROW arena? The abstract of the draft is:
>   "The purpose of this document is to catalog past issues influencing
>    the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRR) for inter-domain
>    routing policy specification and application in the global routing
>    system over the past two decades.  Additionally, it provides a
>    discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in
>    practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer
>    applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based
>    filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day."
>
> Thanks!
> -Chris
> (co-chair)