IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Sat, 01 December 2012 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC27D11E80B8 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:56:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.755, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_DIALUP=0.862, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OUWJOUT2nUEJ for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7BC11E80A5 for <grow@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.133] (r186-48-230-195.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.48.230.195]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9F2308444 for <grow@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:56:29 -0200 (UYST)
Message-ID: <50BA6EFB.4020103@lacnic.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 18:56:27 -0200
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: grow@ietf.org
References: <CAL9jLabt0S98HEygsQp=a98ARwiRxJ2x3F2=H5w-pDRbyqWE7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabt0S98HEygsQp=a98ARwiRxJ2x3F2=H5w-pDRbyqWE7A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Subject: Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 20:56:45 -0000

	I have this draft in my toread list. Sorry about the delay.

	I have read and I support to adopt it as wg item.

.as

On 14/11/2012 20:35, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> Grow Folks,
> the authors of:  draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations
>   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations-01>
> 
> have asked if their work is appropriate for the GROW-wg, could we take
> the next 14 days (ending Nov 28, 2012) to think/discuss this draft and
> it's efficacy to work in the GROW arena? The abstract of the draft is:
>   "The purpose of this document is to catalog past issues influencing
>    the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRR) for inter-domain
>    routing policy specification and application in the global routing
>    system over the past two decades.  Additionally, it provides a
>    discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in
>    practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer
>    applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based
>    filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day."
> 
> Thanks!
> -Chris
> (co-chair)
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email