Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)

Russ White <russw@riw.us> Wed, 21 November 2012 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <russw@riw.us>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BD421F8691 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:42:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.754, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hscxjpYoSSQ3 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from da31.namelessnet.net (da31.namelessnet.net [74.124.205.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6304D21F8675 for <grow@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-071-074-016-043.ec.res.rr.com ([71.74.16.43] helo=[192.168.100.52]) by da31.namelessnet.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <russw@riw.us>) id 1Tb9dk-00022D-Pe; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:42:53 -0800
References: <CAL9jLabt0S98HEygsQp=a98ARwiRxJ2x3F2=H5w-pDRbyqWE7A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabt0S98HEygsQp=a98ARwiRxJ2x3F2=H5w-pDRbyqWE7A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D839E7E2-D3E8-42C2-A494-87F26EB7A39C@riw.us>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A523)
From: Russ White <russw@riw.us>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:42:53 -0500
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Seems clean. You should still use an Antivirus Scanner
Cc: "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations@tools.ietf.org" <draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations@tools.ietf.org>, "grow-ads@tools.ietf.org" <grow-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:42:56 -0000

I think this is good work to adopt, and GROW is a good home for it.

Russ

 Sent from my iPad

On Nov 14, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com> wrote:

> Grow Folks,
> the authors of:  draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations
>  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations-01>
> 
> have asked if their work is appropriate for the GROW-wg, could we take
> the next 14 days (ending Nov 28, 2012) to think/discuss this draft and
> it's efficacy to work in the GROW arena? The abstract of the draft is:
>  "The purpose of this document is to catalog past issues influencing
>   the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRR) for inter-domain
>   routing policy specification and application in the global routing
>   system over the past two decades.  Additionally, it provides a
>   discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in
>   practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer
>   applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based
>   filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day."
> 
> Thanks!
> -Chris
> (co-chair)
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow