IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-simple-va

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 29 April 2012 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F202F21F85C6; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2bnpnlNMpRr; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og106.obsmtp.com (exprod7og106.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3713021F85C7; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob106.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT52g9R56viCGEvr84cQayKDag1zvGHLM@postini.com; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:13:43 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:13:41 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:13:40 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "robert@raszuk.net" <robert@raszuk.net>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:13:39 -0400
Thread-Topic: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-simple-va
Thread-Index: Ac0lmMi09H4F5Uy0ScS65NZjwALcOQAqpovA
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76AD2906F@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76AB92C3B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <4F9BCB90.9090000@raszuk.net> <4F9C80BA.9040003@raszuk.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F9C80BA.9040003@raszuk.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-simple-va
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:13:44 -0000

If we
> think that we should move the discussion to ietf-interest or similar
> bigger alias to discuss what community support for a given work in IETF
> really means I will be happy to do that.
> 
> Best regards,
> R.
> 

Robert, 

This is a pretty good idea! 

So, I would ask the chairs to post another WG last call on both documents. In the last call, please mention that we are looking to gage community interest, so silence  will not be interpreted as consent.

Robert, would you be willing to call attention to the last call on whatever mailing lists you think appropriate. The list ietf@ietf.org leaps to mind, but you might think of others, too.

                                                                    Ron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email