Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-evan-amateur-radio-ipv6
Federico Santandrea <sntfrc@proton.me> Tue, 20 June 2023 13:40 UTC
Return-Path: <sntfrc@proton.me>
X-Original-To: ham-ag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ham-ag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17574C151554; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HB0GYFIx850K; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch (mail-40137.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.137]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FC1C15198D; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:40:13 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=s7vaqnrdjbe3rbhrkwvmpd5fli.protonmail; t=1687268418; x=1687527618; bh=Nxd/Yw2LK6hwslwpRps9lTW6vncaC0RF4a3VIFWl+O4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=X0VOfB237kB/4/AhQuWE77uMI7IdtTXbyUFIy2hdP9dBYc3FXXyKiVWQnJR0DNUtK uIQB5kFA8f2cfIwV2teBXDnuuUridK2OLr9izEBkCkUWvUohjYJyp8+760myQQolNf A8vEBk84fvdtJ/kLz54e8v875Blhr+oT5iwEchEjIPfrVVnUMuv/L4MwXkqb3xaTC3 nlg8jj/GSW4o16uJHqeBmGnhqW1pyUd/Oiihvpk2105nzVDtc0zWpIl6Yskr7qk5+M MAu8B1v9F+BI6+Oz3a+lNPXS71eUaE1WSic3HIotjqsyEpp790YSn04lOYs8f3OAlq 4EFHC0ZbF4h9Q==
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ham-ag@ietf.org" <ham-ag@ietf.org>, "alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com" <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
From: Federico Santandrea <sntfrc@proton.me>
Message-ID: <IwWJLExPjjZWsu1PwUQ9vmOpV81o1H5x8xAF2Lpcrr5rKSDZiLQxy_TXcA2vJzt2OyMF4ALdqRVXxdsVXdPnw4vzKeYuj2wk5m-ZwbAtWCM=@proton.me>
Feedback-ID: 66659935:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ham-ag/JCF0BgC4HOlptcdQLVEKM78svJo>
Subject: Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-evan-amateur-radio-ipv6
X-BeenThere: ham-ag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: HAM Radio Operators Affiliate Group <ham-ag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ham-ag>, <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ham-ag/>
List-Post: <mailto:ham-ag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ham-ag>, <mailto:ham-ag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:42:41 -0000
> On 17/2/23 17:04, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: >> >> >> Le 16/02/2023 à 01:10, Nick Harper a écrit : >> There appears to be a need of having the callsign in IID. > > How is this need satisfied for IPv4? Traditionally the IPv4 packets are sent over an AX.25 data link layer. The callsign is in the AX.25 layer address field, i.e. it is the hardware address. The AX.25 address format allows for 6 characters plus a numeric "SSID" 0-15 number, which is widely perceived to be limiting. So, in this scenario there is no need to identify radio station at the network level. If using an Ethernet data link layer instead (which probably will become much more common when using IPv6 as the AX.25 tools are old and probably won't be updated to be IPv6 aware), the strict analogous would therefore be having the callsign encoded into the source MAC address. That it also appears in the IPv6 address, after an (optional) application of EUI-64 SLAAC, would just follow. The algorithm described in draft-evan-amateur-radio-ipv6 sounds like a nice way to accomplish this encoding, and usefully expands on the current 6 character limitation. It is true that there is no way for an Internet user to determine that the IP is somehow related to an ham radio callsign without knowing, but the identification requirement is only relevant to the on-air part of the link. There, it would even be satisfied by the Ethernet hardware address alone, even if SLAAC is not used. -- Federico
- [HAM-AG] Request for feedback: draft-evan-amateur… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… David Farmer
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Nick Harper
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Nick Harper
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… David Farmer
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [HAM-AG] Request for feedback: draft-evan-ama… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… David Farmer
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… David Schinazi
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Ron Bonica
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Evan Pratten
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… David Farmer
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Warren Kumari
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Fernando Gont
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [HAM-AG] [IPv6] Request for feedback: draft-e… Federico Santandrea