Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards track work

On 04/20/2010 03:44 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:

Hi,

for the design and implementation reasons discussed earlier on this 
mailing list, I'd give my support on draft-keranen-hip-native-nat-traversal.

> Hi,
>
> we need to decide what to do with NAT traversal when moving to the
> standards track. We have the following drafts:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-nat-traversal/
>
> The draft above will soon become an Experimental RFC.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-keranen-hip-native-nat-traversal/
>
> The draft above proposes implementing HIP-based connectivity checks
> instead of STUN-based ones.
>
> http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-melen-hip-nat-mm-00.txt
>
> The draft above, which needs to be revised, describes the mobility and
> multihoming extensions for NAT traversal.
>
> I would like to hear people's views on what to do here.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gonzalo
> HIP co-chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec