IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com> Mon, 15 September 2014 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15871A6EEC for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYnZ9edpdv1N for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A5191A6EE9 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f793d6d000005356-fa-5416d8613873
Received: from ESESSHC014.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 34.86.21334.168D6145; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:15:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:15:28 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D441102A6; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:15:28 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7D94E98A; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:16:53 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C394A4E947; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:16:52 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_55D6596B-5C44-42B2-8EB9-D563CB55D4B9"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5416CF8D.1070707@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:15:26 +0300
Message-ID: <378ABA05-5E61-40C2-A105-C8A967EE03CB@ericsson.com>
References: <20140905182558.7340.5516.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <540A04E3.2040203@tomh.org> <9BFCB5CC-FD77-49C2-9A67-39AEB45530D1@nominum.com> <540B2A2E.9040905@tomh.org> <540C3EB0.2000004@gmail.com> <5416CF8D.1070707@ericsson.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrNIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7iDbEQgwOf5S0OLb7EajGz5x+j xaGXf5gtpi6azGwxfe81dout3bEWF9b/YrFovPuHyYHDo2VVL7PH2u6rbB6rXrWzeeycdZfd Y8mSn0weM49/YfF4fWA+q8eeaxoBHFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGUc2drMVnHOsuNv8i7WB8aFN FyMnh4SAiUT7p/WsELaYxIV769m6GLk4hASOMkpcWtfDCuFsYJS4v2s5I4Szl1Fi5v+1TBDO OkaJKTOeQJXNY5T4232XBcRhFpjCKHHkwS0mkMm8AgYSx7//ZAGxhQUsJLbvu8QIYrMJaEls XL6ADcTmFNCRmNd/C8xmEVCVeH2mkwli0GomiaV7Z0ENspdYencj1LrnjBLT5pxnBkmICJhJ LG5bwwTxh7zEhw/H2SFsNYmr5zaB1QgJqEjc+nuWbQKjyCxkF85CciGIzSygLbFs4WtmCNtA 4mnnK1YI21Ti9dGPjBC2tcSMXwfZIGxFiSndD9kXMLKvYhQtTi0uzk03MtZLLcpMLi7Oz9PL Sy3ZxAiM7YNbfuvuYFz92vEQowAHoxIP74IdYiFCrIllxZW5hxilOViUxHkXnZsXLCSQnliS mp2aWpBaFF9UmpNafIiRiYNTqoHR90G2dbl32SyugkOq3yWmCjKfu+tm9vJgSknu37+GbE8m POGP1Y03UDnwoW7Xf2k729leEfte9E38YRWxSSvP7OPpK1uNQtKD5ikZWUdEXP32MvfoPUsR v6KOU1ObFHbzNV27cy9j5cVrgi3zw+fczFzz+TDL3Okvs79e+F84N37ep0QXoUmdSizFGYmG WsxFxYkA4dvjxM4CAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/KxRh9wGWOcVlhB68Pdl2to9TZnA
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 01:36:35 -0700
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>, Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:15:33 -0000

Hi Tom,

Can you respond on the Gen-ART review thread? I’d love to clear my discuss, but I have not seen a response yet… and it might be that your newer draft version have already taken all this into account.

Jari

On 15 Sep 2014, at 14:37, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Tom (Henderson),
> 
> Jari, Brian, and Ted still have discusses on this document. Could you
> please summarize for each of them the status of this draft with respect
> to their particular comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 
> On 07/09/2014 2:17 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
>> I'm happy with the outcome. The list discussion addressed the issue. I
>> believe the outcome is: "The plaintext attack is resistible, not a real
>> problem, and need not be addressed in the document."
>> 
>> Tom Taylor
>> 
>> On 06/09/2014 11:37 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2014 08:25 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>>> It looks like the latest rev of 5201-bis does not address the gen-art
>>>> review comments nor Francis Dupont's comments, and I haven't seen any
>>>> follow-up discussion on Francis' comments.   What do the authors
>>>> believe the status of these two comment threads is?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ted,
>>> 
>>> I believe that there is only one open issue left from the Gen-Art
>>> review, regarding possible plaintext attacks:
>>> 
>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/42
>>> 
>>> The list discussion on this issue leans against making any change; see
>>> the last message of this thread:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03903.html
>>> 
>>> I think I previously handled all of the other comments; if I missed any,
>>> please point them out.
>>> 
>>> I have tried to contact Francis a couple of times regarding
>>> clarification of his comments and have not seen a reply.  This is
>>> tracked in issue:
>>> 
>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/49
>>> 
>>> I'm cc'ing both Tom Taylor and Francis for any further clarifications.
>>> 
>>> - Tom
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email