Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status
Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org> Tue, 16 September 2014 05:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tomh@tomh.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA78F1A02D4 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQmAYD0wWpG0 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EFA71A02C1 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14561 invoked by uid 0); 16 Sep 2014 05:20:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2014 05:20:45 -0000
Received: from box528.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.128]) by CMOut01 with id rhLc1o00Z2molgS01hLflR; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:20:43 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=LbyvtFvi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=K/474su/0lCI2gKrDs9DLw==:117 a=K/474su/0lCI2gKrDs9DLw==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=ZSdzdHkL1-cA:10 a=eJebKyjBspgA:10 a=AGHQCz_AdLoA:10 a=q7J0aIbBmN8A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=HYWc1YUsAAAA:8 a=IA_2sfgTpx8A:10 a=rREcAdlOb-AA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=nW_ckIbMICANdN_qIC4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=sr1zk7XcdwYA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tomh.org; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=9YEBECbD9749VhAfWDkhMzvO0AbzKJBcS4iEP4o+dx0=; b=OLnzvIYADMWoXkmoCCln1ZhIZpALVck+gPQqh8Oyl5B0ys9qZXrl6+5i++kLfHca4C2BbhkOvoy5wMrpzPC6y7+fYzA/CNISB0L68o6Ll5nFqq8lYY1EDhZvGIuYm7p2;
Received: from [71.231.123.189] (port=44236 helo=[192.168.168.42]) by box528.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <tomh@tomh.org>) id 1XTlBt-0005Yq-QI; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:20:37 -0600
Message-ID: <5417C8A2.9070800@tomh.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:20:34 -0700
From: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
References: <20140905182558.7340.5516.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <540A04E3.2040203@tomh.org> <9BFCB5CC-FD77-49C2-9A67-39AEB45530D1@nominum.com> <540B2A2E.9040905@tomh.org> <540C3EB0.2000004@gmail.com> <5416CF8D.1070707@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5416CF8D.1070707@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {3122:box528.bluehost.com:tomhorg:tomh.org} {sentby:smtp auth 71.231.123.189 authed with tomh@tomh.org}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/tawMCBcXaUV0o9NplJGUYDUJ6WQ
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>, HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>, Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:20:46 -0000
On 09/15/2014 04:37 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Tom (Henderson), > > Jari, Brian, and Ted still have discusses on this document. Could you > please summarize for each of them the status of this draft with respect > to their particular comments? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > Gonzalo, the most recent status on this draft was posted to the HIP list in this message: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03942.html Since then, it seems that Jari and Brian have cleared their discusses. I believe that the IANA issues have been mostly resolved (Ted's discuss). Ted's discuss was against version -14 of the draft, while we are at version -17 now. There is a lingering comment that I haven't picked up from Barry (item 5 in the above email) that pertains to IANA text; I plan to publish those in version -18. I could probably put out a version -18 shortly that may resolve all of the open issues, but it just requires that I generate a new Appendix C example packet. I'll try to get to that in the next day or two. - Tom
- [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-1… internet-drafts
- [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Tom Henderson
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Ted Lemon
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Tom Henderson
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Tom Taylor
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Tom Henderson
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Jari Arkko
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Jari Arkko
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Tom Henderson
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Ted Lemon
- Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status Gonzalo Camarillo