IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] comments on draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-01

Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> Mon, 21 February 2011 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BF23A6DD8 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:27:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qN7exZXvryEv for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:27:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E443A6D03 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:27:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hutcs.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.192.10] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.hut.fi with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1PrXgK-0005fK-3h for hipsec@ietf.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:28:12 +0200
Message-ID: <4D62845E.1020603@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:27:26 +0200
From: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hip WG <hipsec@ietf.org>
References: <FD98F9C3CBABA74E89B5D4B5DE0263B9379A8486D1@XCH-NW-12V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4D626A88.6060806@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D626A88.6060806@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] comments on draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-01
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:27:37 -0000

Hi,

On 21/02/11 15:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> - ESP (5202), Rendezvous (5204), and DNS (5205) are listed as normative
>>    references, but 5201 is not referenced
>>
>> Section 5.1 talks about moving Host Identities from one physical
>> computer to
>> another without breaking transport associations. Really?
>
> You would need a secure channel (hint, hint) to move the Security
> Association, including all private key needed that are not technically
> part of the SA.  But, yes, there are people looking into this for cloud
> computing.

actually I would agree with Jeff here. I think the experiment report 
would be a better fit for such research work. I would include also 
reference to the earlier work:

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.79.5588&rep=rep1&type=pdf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email