IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] draft-boutier-homenet-source-specific-routing-00

Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com> Fri, 12 July 2013 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BCA21F9DC2 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 03:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apdjwHKqB609 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 03:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-x22c.google.com (mail-qe0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD43621F9DBB for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 03:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 5so5039816qeb.31 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 03:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=hzsPL0g6os6f85P9c4GAfbw70asQjBO24laLM33Rm1w=; b=VUx/mB8G20RS43jdP0hir/KuwDXKXNjb8HbXfQvz0nrgNo1x6YQSiUj938KmMWXzGK 54Xdj0FcszoWVvqBdi+NMOUb+GnpTRfIW2MibxkeUwL/Nf49Wse3ZhPYpbwrwD5Zuhlf dQlUvQTx1S7x6cAklFVH2DFeLs8CTKJQx+zc+99cFhITAcBCjGm6qU6rWjZhGV+gZnnf QucSE6JxggbAv3wEXb1nU427UtC3RgCy1Tto63gMAyWaurK9q9o40CHuFamJ1o1ynupg rW59w4SCPRB8U74LHadgXoXuIAfjF2x2sZRqPALZ6+5yUlKnZ3Fh7Ikytkkx2YoCxhpM sAnQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.8.130 with SMTP id h2mr36870308qah.9.1373626513249; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 03:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.27.73 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 03:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87ip0hkzqh.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <7ippuz4fb8.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAKD1Yr3HZOJecNP6hE1yOBdGAxxXzMb5W23aPm9XhZv0fzKBUQ@mail.gmail.com> <7ibo6iw7ch.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAKD1Yr0_yZsvw58hwjY++9RJT9urkKbX33zzwTjyWGTKK7RoVg@mail.gmail.com> <87ehbdi33a.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAKD1Yr0x=j0tvkM2X8bGw4T538mnm7CV592GBHO76dSVhGLE7w@mail.gmail.com> <87wqp0lal6.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAKD1Yr1knC76T14bcGY3kbYBMNfhvC9vACjguNaWCdRXxZ-4UA@mail.gmail.com> <87bo6bwzxn.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAGnRvuqdhmYiUk5roQw0iNbyfm49Fixjo_44f_HcCLjKpZdYNA@mail.gmail.com> <8761wjwyt7.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAGnRvuqX9fcYShdJVs9QocEdSOp3VJPHAnF1phF6XQ+V+NdEaQ@mail.gmail.com> <87ppuq7epd.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAGnRvup2yG6uw-qx2xmAbMLdOMADX7=nde12VP8ie0Lb26y7Ww@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0zRoe+E=Rk7s-spChvbmB4tijGdt_U2NWQPUA-6=YPbA@mail.gmail.com> <87ip0hkzqh.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:54:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuq1TbZ5pP1pSrRdOtauuVRE9nC=CaLQ9d0eOFdcWiLozQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] draft-boutier-homenet-source-specific-routing-00
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:55:15 -0000

The problem with "forbidding" such topologies will be that things will
break and users will not know why.

Henning Rogge

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> But isn't this an impossible requirement to meet in reality?
>
> I have no idea.  We're just exploring the space of possible solutions
> right now -- hey, it's not like we've had a lot of operational
> experience with source-specific routing yet.  We're playing with
> things, and looking what breaks.
>
>> What if users plug things in in such a way that there is no such
>> path between two given gateways?
>
> Things break.  We make sure things break as gracefully as possible.
> Then we'll need to ask ourselves whether we want to support such
> hybrid topologies in the first place.
>
> (My gut instinct is to agree with you -- we'll probably want to forbid
> hybrid networks --, but I'm keeping an open mind until we learn more.)
>
> -- Juliusz
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet



-- 
We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered
long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email