Re: [homenet] draft-boutier-homenet-source-specific-routing-00

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5E211E8105 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3XatdXTwo2Mu for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1140321F8994 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id lx15so4408105lab.35 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=H1jxSkdf30L3yIm/WOcWPJKkmhsaBcIZAZ7zgbXnr3k=; b=GFlKyIzchQ+achK2eDssVV/YQ7NihEx0UOP9N0kR1BObflAs8Evd65z4pCTlSXk2rh iZ4/1YCIlDmiwdMQm0JgJ5xQs5TvwieO3Fpfo0t6jibeKwoup4GPWM3RewkcQqEvIeP3 l+O5GoPiBF1TJ7MFHTAGTGUI1cG3jT2U0tzye3iH4sh/ko4vPZSmxtpvvKadwIhQ4hM7 j9JnfsNFsPyh4R8GWCGsvP5HaCpOm+b2Z9sef2YNkEpescmS5UEIo/F9+9T4YGkgOPg4 D5FVqJ8+hHZ32CGlseVHaaxlp1nhKZzY+SVLI7Y/4sI8/rmNOTc2l9JiHIvx9shVq7NB hEOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=H1jxSkdf30L3yIm/WOcWPJKkmhsaBcIZAZ7zgbXnr3k=; b=aOwA3rI/5nNe4xmTa93MTHYZv1O9Ur5pNqF5hUQ2RC1so1+dnrej5RFTLFPnQI31BQ 85pPS/TQtgvjYoCbIkfErVGA6aVM+IhRvjyFF/1OQET3C9Sou20Fbeuk5ieTy7OpD5T7 /DzXQzRcBaiRLgX3r6wjZUxYgUPOOHWKCo/+HPlnDDNH2FnZ4vIiFEGr82ytGT2E80Ln ONd/WHmC/iBMNAfRYJZPE3aqnhIlOnbonotXU7m3T8EZc0bPdGHl5ONYRe46ivqyu5Xg tD0J2dTCN8GeWTweQXopILaLxg+ozYv6iyQVqFj88DQMSG8PV5WEkFlO/v2oStzoGogw wWqg==
X-Received: by 10.152.23.99 with SMTP id l3mr11578249laf.82.1373339419516; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.30.195 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7ippuz4fb8.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <7ippuz4fb8.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 12:09:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxrV=DZ5dAFizxSTGaZba=KUit59p6uaBZq+2TfMquMRJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkK/NrIJ0FCEUlNz0cm6tH1J74IOkCcgejzNg5HuAGpiaDYFDBw3QG8BUE8sRk4C/59b7czmaMRcRlgtANRw3iMXDUaX1jLRV/ycW3JRy/2nLfU/sEQqnIy3Q2KRzRS+DogBXSVLs69yggwyGDthW8UFXlI/t9iiH7JOEH/THNwAfRoZ5Aw/qmAM54ylk6zoACzfOIx
Cc: "<homenet@ietf.org>" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] draft-boutier-homenet-source-specific-routing-00
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:10:23 -0000

On 4 July 2013 04:24, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
> Dear group, dear chairs,
>
> Matthieu Boutier and myself have just submitted
>
>   http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boutier-homenet-source-specific-routing-00.txt

Juliusz,

A question and a few nits.

[ Section 1, paragraph 2 ]

I'm afraid I'm having a difficult time parsing the sentence, "First,
since a router only controls the next hop, a route can only be
selected by the network if it has a selected route as its suffix,
which makes some forms of global optimisation difficult or
impossible."

I think "suffix" is tripping me up somehow.  Can you clarify what that
means?  (possibly I just lack some essential context)

[ Section 2.2.2, last paragraph ]

"which in turn will send it back to B" --> "back to C", if I'm reading
things correctly.

[ Section 5, paragraph 2 ]

I do not think you mean to say that OSPF/IS-IS are both distance
vector and link state "within" areas.  I think you mean
s/within/(between|among)/ somewhere in there.