IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Info about IS-IS demo from Bits N Bites Prague

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Fri, 18 September 2015 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE2E1A89FE for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWE-VhI6hntS for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30EF61A88F2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/56228) with ESMTP id t8IHNBCx020959; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 19:23:11 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4BC61FA2; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 19:23:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id GIlrc2bo20ps; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 19:23:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from trurl.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8224761FA5; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 19:23:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 19:23:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87lhc3proz.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Christian Franke <chris@opensourcerouting.org>
In-Reply-To: <55FA3EF5.6000704@opensourcerouting.org>
References: <55FA3EF5.6000704@opensourcerouting.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 19:23:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 55FC487F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 55FC487F.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 55FC487F.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/7cRI4Z7pj7RiaS6Z8hHdTlwzJQE>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Info about IS-IS demo from Bits N Bites Prague
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:23:14 -0000

> - Transport: both L2 & IPv6 (Link-Local)

Which is suggested for Homenet?  The two don't interoperate, right?

> - Point-to-Multi-Point or Broadcast over L2 or IPv6

Which is suggested for Homenet?  Or do the two interoperate?

> These are standard IS-IS wide metrics, although it makes use of the per
> neighbor metrics available with draft-lamparter-isis-p2mp.

Does this interoperate with standard IS-IS?

> To address this, links without metric information (i.e. direct links
> between clients) will not be considered for SPF. Since 802.11 frames
> from clients to clients are relayed by the AP, this actually can reflect
> the metrics better.

Are you assuming that there are no dumb layer 2 APs in the network?

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email