IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Info about IS-IS demo from Bits N Bites Prague

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 30 September 2015 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FE71A1B3F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXqIpFXl9qRW for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58371A1B30 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 30041A1; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:26:23 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1443601583; bh=EKZuvN1Fpyxbr2ZyEfn76ZquVkUhKTVoiwyWg8vsjho=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=4q0MYG7b9n7jSmeROtP9A8KX1qmi2w9jHGrOshUrQaq+7144H+D3Ik3E6N8hI8Vrb dYNW9ncpRY9RyRALKAgFFZ/cYce5f/Lqix5Jh7JClgVkgX8QOKvxQD/0TJF/7Ve+xT 3gRycfAG3VDoCEsunoO8cm+Un+Qj80JhuwA/6qDQ=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3249F; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:26:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:26:23 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87k2r95dr5.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509301025290.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <55FA3EF5.6000704@opensourcerouting.org> <87lhc3proz.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509240801390.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <87k2r95dr5.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/JoaXlobAc5EuQjiIczb_DvTl8BA>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Info about IS-IS demo from Bits N Bites Prague
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:26:27 -0000

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:

>>> Are you assuming that there are no dumb layer 2 APs in the network?
>
>> Yes, that is a tradeoff.
>
> Could the chairs please clarify whether restricting ourselves to
> a particular class of topologies is acceptable for Homenet?

Well, it would be informative if we actually finally had the discussion on 
what kind of Homenet we're actually aiming for. We still have no concensus 
on that as far as I can tell.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email