IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Dynamic metrics in IS-IS

Gabriel Kerneis <kerneis@google.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kerneis@google.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0FC1B5D46 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z1sQuFPQVTAp for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F871B5D3F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so192104665wic.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cHcujD7YtiiJWaIhYjyugebW6ltAKtLF9dXtRiuWU6U=; b=DIRJDfAPFdNw0Ig3zPqkd22TStQ34lgTznnm3fX1CCoGJVqfaNYXGm9erHFc1yEm7G DLm+2pSmApOl7IqwNcaZjp5qB5x45DoLwoWR/bvXF0kHfiFzh8Z66vERR/DU+uiDyt20 IZwuzZzEG2fJUJvzoaKIvfRWm8CfvJLZiG/ZlvaZMJk5Ovp1Hqx11/dcfMTY7cz95QVJ eVvkh+04AdOExt1vl+1stDmmDBzdWIzO/MSa2VeAuxzN6aWHECijo8pO4gSi3zqAaVP9 ShDKiMXaHoQxCopVGdO4jIfA/8dS+IaGhCSBQKx0VJSk2T3v5S2CVNA1PZqIsw7OVIUA rL3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cHcujD7YtiiJWaIhYjyugebW6ltAKtLF9dXtRiuWU6U=; b=HaHnn7c7hqZIWvOeeLmh28Sa2vx1CVAOcNLwjmj5TNRB3syNl5qsPhqgoxUmFkfYcO /t/0gP8y3KC9xN3j07EBQmLlrXT0SNiUEnQi7R4MhIlkPdfEcxUba/Z914Mx4yxWDvTb Y+p1A+sKQFzxG+Vz0gdaL1aasD+JaUGQQmLNckb8KFB4wsdIpTdD7nFX/7a55Ov66SOR 2g6YgJktzxno4RQ1pmFoGk3HwHKbq3m7JbpZ5rYCVUImKkFu9aD0IX44p5d0mDGa6Ta/ j0g+sAOPSPGmcHFD+eZ+8yp/UYMTsJ1Aj6J7t9yaYoLZHou821pMuRQpDnmTqXImKry6 ktnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTKGr5y6lhJA8Uj0LGV6G0uFSJgsc/10mU8DL6WG3Ric0fYtpjYQ7WRNZTRdxK+7VvD2JW
X-Received: by 10.180.87.1 with SMTP id t1mr3921562wiz.33.1443612092643; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.223.70 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zj04tb1a.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <55FA3EF5.6000704@opensourcerouting.org> <87mvwjprwl.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAGnRvure=W90ZYpaVSJBLoTzq=6ypE3ef-XEmHSzLPZdV+BT-Q@mail.gmail.com> <87io6t5doi.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509301026250.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <87k2r8uuz4.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509301208141.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <877fn8ur89.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509301247110.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <87zj04tb1a.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Gabriel Kerneis <kerneis@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:20:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL0WyWxAbki-zyK=gBCsZQNTYBGyXNU2XyYEtuYPaPySwO85EQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d044481affa1cd00520f52150"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/DuHU0BFwfH1r6AVxsAlU2ram7E4>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Dynamic metrics in IS-IS
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:21:35 -0000

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <
jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:

> > a valid test of the metric setting features would be to have two wifi
> > networks, one 2.4GHz, one 5Ghz, two different L2s, different IP
> > networks, and then walk around with two clients connected together with
> > a network cable, and check if the routing would change from the 5GHz
> > network to the 2.4GHz network as distance from the AP increases and the
> > 5GHz network stops working.
>
> That would be an interesting test if you can show that Christian's code
> works better in this case than plain IS-IS and not much worse than
> a recent babeld.


That would be an interesting test regardless of the outcome. Please, do
share negative results too:
https://www.elsevier.com/authors-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/why-science-needs-to-publish-negative-results

Gabriel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email