IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Working Group draft adoptions

Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> Fri, 19 September 2014 06:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@townsley.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B2C1A7016 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1A4XLzsvjXuH for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4294F1A7014 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m15so1918911wgh.19 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=vrGEvpckitWnbPRlp4e7mOC7Q7jcfNYigVVeUgftFg8=; b=cn1zYLGcCuUmH/6TgPgN0vw+1OYr1wJP0FusqpEHOqJCIL3C9rSlMg1+e1/1TyBfd9 Bp3t7/7y+n9eEu6ZnVn76ONowt3s7hXeGub+YrdrqWhaddetO/yWQ3u4vvdau/m9ozzY 9ufJ+mK6ZxNrz0UWwXFv+IjwxbkYO0F3//7dBQVihgjjGBZiothHnH9Cxc2beo5Jlin1 lyBGzU17RsC2mLsEGCsj3T8lhaW/me1Io7+hUWKR9xAXH+Xegi3FgI+hvBSUCrafCpuo LhLWrgwITHfxfm1AH9poTYWW5A4sIcurnAPj8kEZ3e+V/PdphVDiUHgJ2fmonWnJz4Iw BMag==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnq2RJwf5Fvtftc7HgonkMu2ke2Jrb7Naft61z00NU3N0ekPmhnoMOkVKmPr7chaLxRxUI0
X-Received: by 10.194.134.100 with SMTP id pj4mr10477203wjb.72.1411108881850; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:c0c1:8:fc82:7292:9345:df75? ([2001:420:c0c1:8:fc82:7292:9345:df75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pk9sm1149080wjb.16.2014.09.18.23.41.20 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_97427801-A524-4C1F-A92B-3EB59264E93E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>
In-Reply-To: <62AA760926A38745AAF06AD7319065FD5A23946E7F@HE113456.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:41:04 +0200
Message-Id: <297662FB-DB0B-45C8-96C2-94DEC73D74C8@townsley.net>
References: <62AA760926A38745AAF06AD7319065FD5A23946E7F@HE113456.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
To: normen.kowalewski@telekom.de
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/Bit-F8xXI7mqaXeoep4NT74lh2U
Cc: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>, homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Working Group draft adoptions
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:41:26 -0000

On Sep 16, 2014, at 2:12 PM, normen.kowalewski@telekom.de wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> Regarding  
>  
> * draft-mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation
> * draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options
>  
> I think this is useful work and support its adoption.
>  
> However, I’d like to see these drafts generalized so that mechanisms to provide authorization credentials towards the DNS are not limited to only being provided via DHCP, so that the architecture could also be used within other configuration management approaches as well, e.g. via Netconf/Yang.

Not the first time we have heard the need to decouple from dhcp, and this is one reason the dhc-options draft is separate. The change notes for version 3 of front-end-naming-delegation indicate that it is the authors intention already to do so as well. In any case, it's one of the first things the WG could ensure happens if there remain any vestiges in the doc that tie configuration to dhc-only. 

Also, we could use some authors for the netconf/yang version as well, please take this as a gentle nudge ;-)

- Mark

>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Normen Kowalewski
>  
> Deutsche Telekom AG
> Group Headquarters
>  
> P.S. My apologies to the email reviewer(s), since I have needlessly clobbered your review queue with a copy of this content instead of subscribing to this list before sending it.
> Re: [homenet] Working Group draft adoptions
> 
> From: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis at nominet.org.uk>
> To: "homenet at ietf.org Group" <homenet at ietf.org>
> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:38:16 +0000
> List-id: <homenet.ietf.org>
> 
> This email commences a two week period for comments relating to the adoption of the following drafts by the HOMENET Working Group, as promised during our WG session in Toronto:
>  
>   draft-pfister-homenet-prefix-assignment
>   draft-mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation
>   draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options
>  
> If you have any comments please reply to this message, but please do not mix up comments on the PA draft and the two Naming drafts in a single reply.
>  
> thanks,
>  
> Ray and Mark
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email