Re: [homenet] Working Group draft adoptions

Thomas Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> Wed, 03 September 2014 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC34A1A030C for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 06:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6-hn7fXZVDk for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 06:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632531A0306 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 06:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F501BC6F3E; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 06:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.147.111] (mtg91-1-82-227-24-173.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.24.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D97E51BC615D; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 06:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5C6E36A6-276C-4B40-8DDF-22EBF54D84B6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Thomas Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
In-Reply-To: <0530DB0A-AA87-45E2-925D-C5C186FCE772@nominet.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:52:13 +0200
Message-Id: <26D1BBFF-B6FB-44E8-88B4-9B43DC9AA054@thomasclausen.org>
References: <0530DB0A-AA87-45E2-925D-C5C186FCE772@nominet.org.uk>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/K_cxd1YNLpBNNwRrwgNx3CvLeFU
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Working Group draft adoptions
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:52:20 -0000

Ray, Mark, all,

On Sep 3, 2014, at 15:38, Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> wrote:

> This email commences a two week period for comments relating to the adoption of the following drafts by the HOMENET Working Group, as promised during our WG session in Toronto:
> 
>   draft-pfister-homenet-prefix-assignment

I have read the I-D above, as part of hacking together some prototype code.

The draft has a couple of rough edges for the WG to polish, but otherwise seems sound both in presentation and in content.

Thus, consider this a hum in favor of adoption, based on having actually implemented from the spec.