IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-haddad-homenet-multihomed-00

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 25 October 2012 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FC921F89C6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.954
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.954 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rvLyhRjImIkN for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA6021F896B for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [67.71.177.200]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC3A81A9; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (quigon.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC02ECA0C6; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:20:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: homenet@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CAKD1Yr0bDoo+AsP=rP0ED5Onf06_fXyNCEQCROKa+6cL-c-Z=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201210011801.q91I1tfW056624@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com> <506A07D1.8050605@gmail.com> <10328E81-3C94-455B-9A37-B421200A5C38@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|19238916f7ff9a0ada655caf80bba8cao9AAbJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|10328E81-3C94-455B-9A37-B421200A5C38@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <7F6EA97D-5DA8-4872-A647-D879B1955824@gmail.com> <49FCFE49-9DFB-44D2-ADAD-636A3C80F906@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|09bc323dc12a06be7c21e18f2752cd05o9LECn03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|49FCFE49-9DFB-44D2-ADAD-636A3C80F906@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <7F4B245F-9355-4134-9176-EB7DB1634469@apple.com> <77A8749D-DF81-4816-8277-CB69861E524A@fugue.com> <C3720598-400C-4B83-9CEC-878B3FA8109E@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|3e5d3f7836c5b4ddbd99d74df88ecc6ao9LJ8r03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C3720598-400C-4B83-9CEC-878B3FA8109E@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <5085905A.8030206@mtcc.com> <52E31542-3B7C-4EC1-9B2C-3C9D8E6B3BB1@apple.com> <50859C1B.7070707@mtcc.com> <CAKD1Yr0v3NdN+QCj=jFiZcv0ox1S-YAj29dZyMd6kAWAv723dg@mail.gmail.com> <24641.1351011789@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAK D1Yr3ry68CLzY34N_9t3=KhCF8SVJM1Fg_TcAF7cr0UXDi8A@mail.gmail.com> <30501.1351120800@sandelman.ca> <CAKD1Yr0bDoo+AsP=rP0ED5Onf06_fXyNCEQCROKa+6cL-c-Z=g@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> message dated "Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:11:18 +0900."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:20:35 -0400
Message-ID: <31084.1351174835@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-haddad-homenet-multihomed-00
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:20:38 -0000

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
    >> In the walled garden situation, however, if I had to hide the AAAA
    >> records (which I think is fundamentally broken, but...), then I'd have
    >> NS delegations from the public DNS into name servers that live in my
    >> walled garden.  So, you could see that my streaming TV system is at
    >> walledgarden.tvservice.jp, but you couldn't resolve
    >> server23.walledgareden.tvservice.jp.
    >> 

    LC> Solution: from the border router which discovered the DNS entries for
    LC> tvservice.jp, inject those DNS servers into the mesh with a tag that they
    LC> only be used for tvservice.jp, and pass that around in the routing
    LC> protocol. No?

While it's reasonable for my TV settop-box to pay attention to that
extension, why would my laptop or browser know about it?

This really seems invasive to multiple layers of the stack, and I think
it is completely unnecessary.  Zone delegations solve the problem using
existing protocols and existing software.

-- 
Michael Richardson
-on the road-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email