IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-haddad-homenet-multihomed-00

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Mon, 29 October 2012 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E6321F86F0 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmCIdJkWF9yL for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com (mail-ea0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301ED21F86EE for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id k13so2160480eaa.31 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=I1D5wBxu4Twp+UCRZrtCik7B/IUB6i+SM2Nz4VMg0xY=; b=P+2P6Q7qHHkbv69c9UIJW7+vuiQDErahIFC4X8+YJdJ/lD09va8yCUWxeHhtr9ox7c smq1S+e6+gFCkKFfqg4pdsFuaGDpssq5ZA7wcAkERWgKDqAE/cOGo61gwFbYofOGZzqO jPjZDmW8znvvdRyN7nHfFHFOGTppqhdxBimYJ7eDNZZPWGBMnGgJf+bvQl3zSj0uUF/V 6uaPhmU74Hjuc6G001HzVA6JmgB6qg7XPutwQpcnWr1yXuP7WtOkw8wVAd5Y+0YstXzi wfnCHi4/E2UAINfRzEX7OkQkEKYN2stgUPsl5MKl0vzk1pecvrkEC7elAT4zEBWYzEui A6Iw==
Received: by 10.14.200.194 with SMTP id z42mr56864228een.13.1351543045322; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.175.173.26] (524A14A4.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [82.74.20.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s1sm24962586eem.9.2012.10.29.13.37.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <7399.1351531305@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:37:23 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3EFC7FC6-EC0F-4FDA-B4F5-4877538E9647@inf-net.nl>
References: <201210011801.q91I1tfW056624@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com> <10328E81-3C94-455B-9A37-B421200A5C38@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|19238916f7ff9a0ada655caf80bba8cao9AAbJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|10328E81-3C94-455B-9A37-B421200A5C38@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <7F6EA97D-5DA8-4872-A647-D879B1955824@gmail.com> <49FCFE49-9DFB-44D2-ADAD-636A3C80F906@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|09bc323dc12a06be7c21e18f2752cd05o9LECn03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|49FCFE49-9DFB-44D2-ADAD-636A3C80F906@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <7F4B245F-9355-4134-9176-EB7DB1634469@apple.com> <77A8749D-DF81-4816-8277-CB69861E524A@fugue.com> <C3720598-400C-4B83-9CEC-878B3FA8109E@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|3e5d3f7836c5b4ddbd99d74df88ecc6ao9LJ8r03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C3720598-400C-4B83-9CEC-878B3FA8109E@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <5085905A.8030206@mtcc.com> <52E31542-3B7C-4EC1-9B2C-3C9D8E6B3BB1@apple.com> <50859C1B.7070707@mtcc.com> <CAKD1Yr0v3NdN+QCj=jFiZcv0ox1S-YAj29dZyMd6kAWAv723dg@mail.gmail.com> <5086B5A7.3040706@mtcc.com> <0435F886-1E8B-4302-832F-C9D0269981A4@apple! .com> < 50896915.6080404@mtcc.com> <994FBBCB-0844-4182-927B-6ED5A7B19986@inf-net.nl> <7399.1351531305@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmWI+eKfHga0EDv23OmsHvToti/KUjem8gcmNfvZZnfViB4iwfZ03ErGUPjtNJT76nYAnr+
Cc: homenet@ietf.org, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-haddad-homenet-multihomed-00
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:37:27 -0000

Op 29 okt. 2012, om 18:21 heeft Michael Richardson het volgende geschreven:

> 
>>>>>> "Teco" == Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> writes:
>    Teco> More thoughts on this scenario. Assume the company has many branch 
>    Teco> offices (e.g. 1000 small sites, with 2001:xxxx::/48 from ISP), 
>    Teco> where main office has 2000::/48. Each branch office is equipped as 
>    Teco> a homenet, the gear is cheap and just acts as the requirements. It
>    Teco> provides Internet access and VPN to main office and indirect to all 
>    Teco> other branches. Branch office managers set up their homenet
>    Teco> equivalent  
>    Teco> to the branch offices. This doubles the number of VPN
>    Teco> tunnels. 
> 
> A question for clarification: the branch office managers setup the
> homenet at their *HOME* to talk to their office. (The fact that the
> branch office may or may not be a homenet is not relevant)
Ack

> 
> Lest anyone think that the Branch Officer Manager won't know how to do
> this, work in ipsecme right now attempts to automate this kind of
> on-demand partial mesh, and make it work cross-vendor.
I'm not so sure ipsecme and our wg products are compatible.

Teco

> 
> -- 
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email