IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] primary / secondary configuration

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 18 June 2019 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672671202B3 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1osfmBk4KKEk for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE93B120299 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A0D4A; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:12:57 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1560870774; bh=LPWPV1TsIcShe2lHFne 9wWHTlW6R58yKkJ/P3f5QilQ=; b=bgy8K3MXQo3h5TlooBkZuj8ZHZNfL3a2Tqf hBa/q/EvF+cyh8K62TcAUYhncqtRhIDd5L9oDnIBQ/Rn4m7NPSC1PvdpFv+uFej0 T+vw67n3gZ0lW2iQcSwHD1Zqr+A4571kAwFFi1meWAhXGFmjxIDJqfgM5U6Hm132 Oqdqbq5Y=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id UBIKMY64rlmT; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:12:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:691a:5c45:bebb:834c] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:691a:5c45:bebb:834c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1596A49; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:12:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <3673C9C0-EA05-4135-A32C-93D2C55D7F3A@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E0786B61-D8B0-4789-A6CB-39E579A74B0A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:12:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: <A79ABAFA-9114-4C5F-92B9-72E1BA7BDD87@fugue.com>
Cc: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net>, homenet <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <CADZyTknGV8huQzVrQcJgFu82HGkOhBe9Q2f23bBXYT8-WOjtPg@mail.gmail.com> <07b0d046-1a1e-7019-49df-46a9470eab48@globis.net> <CADZyTknZNOa9asX49DGbxKFpd1gkgHAkSxyeyH77zOfd__O=eg@mail.gmail.com> <A79ABAFA-9114-4C5F-92B9-72E1BA7BDD87@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/_nXv1icz-eSeyrBzBh2_yC0APaw>
Subject: Re: [homenet] primary / secondary configuration
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:13:04 -0000


> Op 18 jun. 2019, om 17:03 heeft Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> On Jun 18, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> I am also questioning on whether we should provide some sort of recommendations for the UI. While we are not UI designers, I believe some properties could be interesting for designers, and those may be helpful to be provided.
> 
> The trouble that we have gotten into repeatedly in this working group is that we write the specification in anticipation of an implementation, rather than on the basis of experience doing an implementation.   We have a fantastic testbed for this: OpenWRT.   I am at this point somewhat expert in doing OpenWRT builds.   Rather than speculating about what we need to say, why not do an implementation, see how it works, and then do a writeup based on what we learned?   We’re already talking about doing this at the Hackathon.

Running code is always a good teacher
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email