IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] I-D.ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment (RFC 4193 conformance)

Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr> Fri, 10 October 2014 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <SRS0=VMUL=7B=darou.fr=pierre.pfister@bounces.m4x.org>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FC41A0385 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ED-yy-dbq34 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.polytechnique.org (mx1.polytechnique.org [129.104.30.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D9FA1A0390 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-10-61-101-131.cisco.com (173-38-208-169.cisco.com [173.38.208.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 287C01408EEEF; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:50:41 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CCA23AA5-D0CC-4CF1-82FC-E4931B599885"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>
In-Reply-To: <CADhXe52WJ+JONGiwdbxs36QXy1DCnSHvbya+a_U1_oXTQCNhfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:50:50 +0200
Message-Id: <AABE8CC8-4CD0-4413-8935-37CD441D3BF0@darou.fr>
References: <CADhXe52TRJy0MA861bCnWY8LjLZnGQiPbb=qXQhxCirm_DHQ0Q@mail.gmail.com> <54348606.7010507@gmail.com> <A250131C-6D1B-4054-A8AE-EBC1BD899B7E@darou.fr> <5435D586.20806@gmail.com> <20141009004559.44A9E2106591@rock.dv.isc.org> <7E7C5904-3F5B-4B1A-A18D-C5C858B820CD@darou.fr> <CADhXe53LfVrznxN0nFyapvO4jCNn+-xAJ77ZKxEMb9MROwSmGg@mail.gmail.com> <C820B943-B9FB-428C-A4A0-95C01FAA39E9@darou.fr> <CADhXe52WJ+JONGiwdbxs36QXy1DCnSHvbya+a_U1_oXTQCNhfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at svoboda.polytechnique.org (Fri Oct 10 08:50:42 2014 +0200 (CEST))
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/iXu0tO6cDToXMhinyAmgXv1TRGM
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D.ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment (RFC 4193 conformance)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 06:50:48 -0000

Hello Brian and James,

Thanks for the heads up. CANs will be replaced in next version.

So I’m clarifying the two first points in 4.3

   o  It can be delegated by a service provider (DHCPv6 PD, 6rd
      [RFC5969], etc..).

   o  It can be provisioned by an administrative authority (user
      configuration, netconf [RFC6241], etc... ).

And changing the last paragraph of the ULA generation section.

   Note as well that this section doesn't prevent multiple ULA prefixes
   from existing simultaneously.  ULA prefixes may be provided by
   different means, as specified in Section 4.3.  Delegated prefixes
   that are delegated by a service provider or provisioned by an
   authority differ from 'spontaneously' generated prefixes.  They MUST
   NOT be withdrawn if another ULA delegated prefix is observed.


Cheers,

- Pierre


Le 9 oct. 2014 à 22:49, James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> a écrit :

> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr> wrote:
> 
> But I’m going to change it and making it more clear that authorities can provide their own prefixes. Even ULAs.
> 
> Thanks! I'm very pleased to see this agreement.
>  
> 
> -- 
> james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
> Nest Labs, Communications Engineering
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email