Re: [homenet] I-D.ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 08 October 2014 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C9E1A8AB6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MT857e5nOfLU for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD1A1A0110 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w10so5957605pde.0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yspu0U1TPDJYuFdwFqLzubCUleqA83NqJD7r7eJIHds=; b=NaUtRRREcWXEy+B4rFDpw2dFvIQOW5bwyJNirjJve+FTt3I1TXtmHqCthl31T5D12t NgfvMEGBcdGIf5yzCOnPkt5IlsH0J3UTyHRy02FVvyrU3nKERgaXWv4bSOY6XyMnsFfp GVbCkiddYi2vmqWIcXrPLMlbYPuX+7PDu3EA12zRlSNouX0XizHriPXwJPkVYVioQ6Hx rsIdX6z9yP9CWg9JaDT6cSsd2yp67Z+s1df4kad4OTOJXRtz3WMRVAGs7n49TZdTOr2j VSl3+w3N4SW8YXP85UayiIEG60QQSWCmXIC3aKrBTFuybt8AaE79WdSnKk1BfcNOo9S9 AJiA==
X-Received: by 10.68.186.33 with SMTP id fh1mr6847440pbc.105.1412728326179; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (224.200.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.200.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm14868903pdo.29.2014.10.07.17.32.02 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54348606.7010507@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:32:06 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
References: <CADhXe52TRJy0MA861bCnWY8LjLZnGQiPbb=qXQhxCirm_DHQ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADhXe52TRJy0MA861bCnWY8LjLZnGQiPbb=qXQhxCirm_DHQ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/zMmYyvMcjxGPeT4bWCVmGbqDWjU
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D.ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:32:07 -0000

On 08/10/2014 12:14, James Woodyatt wrote:

(quoting draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-00)

>    prefix.  If no ULA prefix can be found in stable storage, it MUST be
>    randomly generated, or generated from hardware specific values.

That sentence is not OK. It should be:

If no ULA prefix can be found in stable storage, it MUST be generated
as specified in [RFC4193].

> The requirements keywords in this section make for a pretty serious interop
> clash with Thread networks <http://threadgroup.org/>, which generate their
> own ULA prefix based on a method defined by its current conventions.

I sincerely hope that method conforms to RFC4193.

    Brian