Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research publication

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Sat, 11 April 2020 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5BA3A1107 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 04:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJ0XY-dgNGCh for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 04:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 873053A1109 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 04:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=39263 helo=[192.168.0.80]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1jNEgU-00061c-5u; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:52:30 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200411114523.GB2429@sources.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:52:21 +0100
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, avri@doria.org, hrpc@irtf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A6D2D46B-478C-47AD-85FB-1FE293FBF649@csperkins.org>
References: <de0ba70d-f2e8-93cb-d2a9-ee6b73b67f18@doria.org> <27c5e9d9-7c8a-985e-2fb1-99ccb50af9a7@cs.tcd.ie> <3A5AEC71-74DB-4FDF-B849-F2343959C903@csperkins.org> <20200411114523.GB2429@sources.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/MXHxYhx6XC4QbqTSpeF_COqHvDQ>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research publication
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:52:35 -0000

> On 11 Apr 2020, at 12:45, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:06:22AM +0100, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote a message of 352 lines which said:
> 
>> we could also work with an appropriate academic publisher to publish
>> archival proceedings,
> 
> A warning: many (most?) "academic publishers" actively prevent the
> free distribution of the articles they publish. If the RG were to
> publish anything as a group, it MUST be in a way that will allow free
> redistribution (as it is the case for the RFCs, see RFC 8721.) No
> Springer-Verlag or Elsevier in the loop.

I’m well aware of these issues, but thank you for the reminder.

-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/