Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research publication

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sat, 11 April 2020 11:43 UTC

Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:41:01 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Stéphane Couture <listes@stephcouture.info>
Cc: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii@gmail.com>, Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Hrpc <hrpc@irtf.org>, Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>
Message-ID: <20200411114101.GA2429@sources.org>
References: <de0ba70d-f2e8-93cb-d2a9-ee6b73b67f18@doria.org> <27c5e9d9-7c8a-985e-2fb1-99ccb50af9a7@cs.tcd.ie> <PR1PR07MB4891B933546D7D221A808694F3C00@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <68b733e9-4053-60d9-b65d-f8dac2712f00@nielstenoever.net> <alpine.LRH.2.21.2004091526060.21348@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAN1qJvA5n=U5ENj7E+Y+yuM+F=EynMq1swCtcKVYHjx9NPtyzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGVFjM+Asv_aq1nNsxTeSt8MhLBnN6ZW3EtbNDk1iAEwmxEeOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN1qJvBQ0LuXHXNMba28cT28-tTB7WxwDL-4W-FCYtsh1y7AUg@mail.gmail.com> <CANZrNV-8EhTJTzXCnNrg7uGTaztPHi4Rj+SytTcg_jP=PZ84Bg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CANZrNV-8EhTJTzXCnNrg7uGTaztPHi4Rj+SytTcg_jP=PZ84Bg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/rAyhxqRztaYAm6pc6-2HKfIYPSE>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research publication
Precedence: list

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 02:08:12PM -0400,
 Stéphane Couture <listes@stephcouture.info> wrote 
 a message of 358 lines which said:

> First, it is a steep learning curve to ask people to use github and
> Markdown language to start writing.

Note that Github is not mandatory. I don't use it, for instance, for
political reasons (it is a centralized service run by Microsoft.)

> Second, it is difficult to categorize this research output in our
> CV: while the process of RFC writing – as it is now – does require
> multiple reviews and is quite demanding, it is still difficult to
> qualify this document as “double blind peer reviewed article”.

I recommend reading « Internet Requests for Comments (RFCs) as Scholarly
Publications »
<http://ccr.sigcomm.org/online/files/p31-v40n1g-carpenterA.pdf>.

[hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research publi… avri
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Mark Perkins
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Stephen Farrell
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Colin Perkins
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Niels ten Oever
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… farzaneh badii
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Mallory Knodel
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Paul Wouters
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… farzaneh badii
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Niels ten Oever
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Stephen Farrell
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Mallory Knodel
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… avri
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… avri
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… avri
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… farzaneh badii
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Stéphane Couture
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Mallory Knodel
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [hrpc] Possible options for a HRPC research p… Colin Perkins
[hrpc] The relevance of RFCs // was: Possible opt… Niels ten Oever
Re: [hrpc] The relevance of RFCs // was: Possible… Paul Wouters