IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-auth] [websec] [saag] re-call for IETF http-auth BoF

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 14 June 2011 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923AB11E8143 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.476, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7L4CRltDzcAM for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1012611E811E for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C560510059 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=nY2htyIfN1ILBJWCw2gEk UVHNsxb0AVChztRDLmjeeab75Asyl5J1BSlbUVhfdnelxV/iM1ZN+ynJEfc4EiGb gEtedyeLkoJSwHwLTPZGk6g1Y4YLvgl18p/QYHhvW+QKT+xEvpX6JdIgfQrql5bz eTI2uo46uJtJVU6+MewTnw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=3gzmiDV2qKc+r5Q4RcVW SKYcdgc=; b=LO5CJjExw4AKiZ28gD297OBbHNpoxF0DyUwyMRCGdLX/LiMnVuDO 7eojxobQI0DMs/bpXuSwXcPvDHFaoB95LHMQygPukbO5DBrjbyB9GQ1DKBtB3OGf v6Ugk4VjxInLLFvIpR4jve9J69Ke8AdAdAOcLaXYH1+k8gqUe6VsGAQ=
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB69C10056 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvh18 with SMTP id 18so2981403pvh.31 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.37.3 with SMTP id u3mr3070081pbj.456.1308070100386; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.50.39 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BE534F2C-926F-4B57-A1A0-93A443AE877E@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <BANLkTi=9TZU=pguCGhLHY+=GbCNjR6w-dA@mail.gmail.com> <E1QWLjG-0007nd-EG@login01.fos.auckland.ac.nz> <BANLkTimT=_qyi5vNoe0tqw8od6mWsjfuzA@mail.gmail.com> <BE534F2C-926F-4B57-A1A0-93A443AE877E@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:48:20 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTingFFaoEc2o8v5ZaqjOr5XAtMfCPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "public-identity@w3.org" <public-identity@w3.org>, "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-auth] [websec] [saag] re-call for IETF http-auth BoF
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-auth>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:48:21 -0000

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> This is about http auth (and I'm glad to see the discussion) but can we keep it to just that list?

The two lists I'm cc'ing now are appropriate for this.  It wasn't
obvious that websec might not be appropriate, though it should have
been obvious that saag wasn't -- my MUA hides dups from me, so it's
all too easy to hit reply-all.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email