Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Request for review and consensus -- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing

[SM <[e-mail]>]

At 13:41 03-09-2008, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>You may have seen this draft a year ago; Sam is back working on it and
>produced version -09 last month.
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-09
>
>If you've reviewed it before, please take a look at the changes.  If
>you'd like to review it, please do.  I'm the shepherd for this draft,
>so comments can be sent to me, to Sam as author, to 
>[e-mail] , or to the IETF general list as appropriate.
>
>In addition to getting general input, I'd like to get a sense of
>whether we have consensus on a couple things.
>
>a).  The statement including "IETF recommends", from section 1.1 of
>the draft:
>
>    "In publishing this memo, the IETF recommends making available

RFC 2606 mentions that an "Informational" specification is published 
for the general   information of the Internet community, and does not 
represent an Internet community consensus or recommendation.  Section 
1.1 of the I-D is at odds with that.  I suggest either reviewing the 
intended status of the I-D or changing that paragraph.

Is this I-D getting into user interface guidelines?  If so, it's not 
standard-track material.

Regards,
-sm