IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ietf-http-auth] Re: Request for review and consensus -- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 09 September 2008 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf-http-auth@osafoundation.org
Delivered-To: ietf-http-auth@osafoundation.org
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org (laweleka.osafoundation.org [204.152.186.98]) by leilani.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F57080D68; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0688C14222C; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.419 tagged_above=-50 required=4 tests=[AWL=0.584, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596]
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uju9FjtqT6b1; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB53D14222B; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id BDE1C4116; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:48:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
References: <47490048-25ED-403E-96B9-0D385F764292@osafoundation.org> <87k5dnyprr.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:48:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k5dnyprr.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:02:00 +0200")
Message-ID: <tsld4jdtrgv.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: ietf-http-auth@osafoundation.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Request for review and consensus -- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing
X-BeenThere: ietf-http-auth@osafoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ietf-http-auth.osafoundation.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ietf-http-auth>, <mailto:ietf-http-auth-request@osafoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-http-auth>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-auth@osafoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-http-auth-request@osafoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ietf-http-auth>, <mailto:ietf-http-auth-request@osafoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:48:59 -0000

Simon, can I get you to analyze what position the IETF should take on
these issues--what form of consensus we're looking for.

For my part, it doesn't make sense to pursue this within the IETF
context--responding to feedback, trying to get a draft that everyone
is happy with--if the IETF is going to take no position.

I agree we need to have a discussion about status.  But first, I'd
like to separate the discussion of what we're getting the IETF to
agree on.

Would you support the IETF making the statement is section 1.1?  If
not, what would you support, or what changes could we make to get to a
point where you would support the statement in section 1.1.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email