IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02, example on 3. 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Fri, 02 October 2015 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4863F1A02BE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 10.221
X-Spam-Level: **********
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DRUGS_ANXIETY=0.01, DRUGS_ANXIETY_OBFU=1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FRT_VALIUM1=10.357, FRT_VALIUM2=2.643, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_VALIUM=2.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MTfWIW12goE7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F7B1A028A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZhsN1-00020G-U3 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 04:54:59 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 04:54:59 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZhsN1-00020G-U3@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tbray@textuality.com>) id 1ZhsMz-0001zU-7s for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 04:54:57 +0000
Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tbray@textuality.com>) id 1ZhsMt-00017b-Jw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 04:54:55 +0000
Received: by iow1 with SMTP id 1so71987892iow.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=s3net7cwah3Eg8ytBYM76qxWueGJ7xwUauW5DEFW2WU=; b=EwZnbQgEzYYqxdkvb2AKCS9Z9ypQTjeX09pYd19fsBnl2K/tJtAmRE9yg6pd+uzLK9 9v2lvSZu7892DBPkxJgeo5KE+aQ7UmlS9n4/kVl4ooYG7ruqQ4abN2CGhQFLNszkT06U 8fXKSz3h93pyOjSua5atYPJ0d8Z0ENlackP+ATpO5YpUAScUk5MlBPvu/RpJFHFVbz7i Dza2zecR4bU7uWGLa6GD6fqQM750u9IoPIAyAS6HP/a1PEuINX1QVx3BWCQBVusa0aHT T7r0TbVRrQWMi2BnDYNms40XHwdp5ys8NHCHe8MW/sYza4ObBEBT45H2x/kcRM/zB0lp b+zA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlGt+nWH19/FvgfkVq1lISxqbEvYK8HE9c150WJYkIHmq7qsik0fWPar7sbRkW8+FOiR+mq
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.157.11 with SMTP id g11mr14904529ioe.30.1443761665104; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.30.4 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.114.83.159]
Received: by 10.79.30.4 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201510020308.t9238Yjj007992@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
References: <560b5cda.4c11190a.c939.52dcSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <CAHBU6iu2qKpYQ_mwMS8vUoXXM3j_R4PBPGR1thZr5v6Bn5ZKJA@mail.gmail.com> <E1Zhi3A-00037O-Gw@maggie.w3.org> <CA+9kkMBcprrTShzj2EmxjHXG1FoiLRPpeurQRvdt_UK-t7P45A@mail.gmail.com> <201510020308.t9238Yjj007992@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:54:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iuiRHVjJmyQFM-Ap3RbC2hx-nDQu2cn-__NgtHK_GHFtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: Laura Kataja <Laura.Kataja@iki.fi>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11403f56307b3a052117f571"
Received-SPF: none client-ip=209.85.223.178; envelope-from=tbray@textuality.com; helo=mail-io0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DRUGS_ANXIETY=1.483, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ZhsMt-00017b-Jw 5c6a2e58c0c0abada709e0d06ae2d626
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02, example on 3. 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAHBU6iuiRHVjJmyQFM-Ap3RbC2hx-nDQu2cn-__NgtHK_GHFtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30312
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I was thinking perhaps of spqr.example.org/<something>
On Oct 1, 2015 8:08 PM, "Kari Hurtta" <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:

> Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>: (Thu Oct  1 23:48:23 2015)
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Kari Hurtta <
> hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Yeah, good catch.  If someone wants to propose a URL for the entity
> > > > blocking the People’s Front of Judea, I’ll wire that in.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Link: <http://example.com/murus-incendii.html>; rel=blocked-by
> > >
> > > (from Laura Kataja)
> > >
> > > / Kari Hurtta
> > >
> > >
> > ​I think you're aiming for "firewall" rendered in Latin.  You might try
> > "vallum" (rampart) or "fossa" (moat).  Or, given that the Romans had
> > censors, "magister morum".
> >
> > ​regards,
> >
> > Ted​
>
> Yes, firewall was quite natural blocing party when message was
>
>      This request may not be serviced in the Roman Province
>      of Judea due to the Lex Julia Majestatis, which disallows
>      access to resources hosted on servers deemed to be
>      operated by the People's Front of Judea.
>
> Yes, rampart or moat are quite possible blocking parties
> on here.
>
> I left Latin to Laura.
>
> / Kari Hurtta
> ( not member of the mailing list )
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email