IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Wed, 18 December 2013 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C141AE005 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:01:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id npL1BTTnvqQ5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFC01AC448 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1VtLPF-0006zH-Jg for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:59:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:59:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1VtLPF-0006zH-Jg@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1VtLOw-0006y6-TU for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:59:18 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1VtLOv-0000sp-HN for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:59:18 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uz6so8247285obc.6 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:58:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1serzutzwT6M8De8q9q/lQZgGLR//43Q1QMKO9dyAyM=; b=p3E6u7AQF412RDMg8HfywS9jzo1K4+UACRwVTO2lv7T2frYv2qoVWJPoyR8AlfPupZ MO51UG3+bIj1go9I3iGcKzR/Whtd1fkNI4fSX9l0NxsqxerVhbBj8Trs/guB2iso6+br oNS+sdkaR4/RCQgqcJ7XWq5paU5fRgc7DDl1T5LWB96a3r0n1TXR+li+6GN4in0eDC3m FGPAb2sOE1IiZnM0k6PdK9t33pKI30uxB27298TOqhT6vS2rA9tZh96ClG0b9GWM//yV 2Rg8i/R50TeFsBwaqy0hZIYSap6a++EnV0vQ6FkFwMFheXsy13g2ZxciSWahl0DxvIbC IS8Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.92.231 with SMTP id cp7mr2839775oeb.66.1387389531131; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.105.114 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:58:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52B1B92A.4020700@cdt.org>
References: <CAFewVt6j0yaRboARj=wpaVO2s9M6j7_za-GXLp9ZWqkFtSys8A@mail.gmail.com> <eme0c50675-de24-47c2-a612-28ffe926e3fd@bodybag> <CAA4WUYj6MCnqLL8-uK_V6WUQv+f1S_DEMio+wLB_DC9CY9xUgA@mail.gmail.com> <52B02095.2010508@cisco.com> <CAA4WUYiZWNtJupQ-6bXO3aNXz1B0qBKoTX9-z-XEjdzTptTLDQ@mail.gmail.com> <52B0A45E.2010901@cisco.com> <CABkgnnX33SooYw2O_L4bX-E4J+9RZgd9O5DtNPNrxB4MX-FSoA@mail.gmail.com> <52B0D3C4.3070502@cs.tcd.ie> <52B0D47B.1090801@stpeter.im> <52B1B92A.4020700@cdt.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:58:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNfq+_c4QvVtP55EQhuejS0BfWnc+g6Mder1jXpoM0Of4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b33d95e2b165a04edd2cc3d"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.175; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f175.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.706, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1VtLOv-0000sp-HN 9410c5c6462781b5d423052320d8aea4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNfq+_c4QvVtP55EQhuejS0BfWnc+g6Mder1jXpoM0Of4g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/21675
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes, they absolutely can be different.

In the 'opportunistic' world, you attempt to use TLS whether or not the
scheme is HTTP or HTTPS.
In the 'unauthenticated' world, you accept an unauthenticated endpoint when
the scheme is HTTP.

The latter depends on the former, but is otherwise completely separate.

-=R


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 12/17/13 5:47 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >
> > Opportunistic or unauthenticated?
>
> Serious question: are those different? Not sure if that has been
> hashed out yet, but willing to read more if I've missed it. best, Joe
>
> - --
> Joseph Lorenzo Hall
> Chief Technologist
> Center for Democracy & Technology
> 1634 I ST NW STE 1100
> Washington DC 20006-4011
> (p) 202-407-8825
> (f) 202-637-0968
> joe@cdt.org
> PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
> fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSsbkqAAoJEF+GaYdAqahxLmUQAIEDuUyLvabSVKrU53f4ZOQD
> Xv5RHr66H7VCKHpSaepStGmavm3lzbNp6e2FeRftpn46ho99+vjmQLQUSA9U/G6j
> ohi2aFbcHYvjH7ca2q9y6M7Dl+elLHKHJxnn68gqDDq/yWTNeVgrq4It0Bh4xq2p
> qDYypQj8xyI6slw1VwJa7STHRhj7CwL4dlYE/BIyJQNCnJpqLj7bTF62GRFcQkKO
> 7p9/rvAbd2cYjNzodzb+JNzAKm1uSKRyj7ufUO61j2WKi7AO5uAWagMD+64trAhj
> hwGUqiDjuCpMoQlNC0MYR9ssL0QVI+/jmb6ps+ZcKzw1G1AxXX3eQd6CVTf2ez0s
> UzdxuRxxNviYkbiIqnraP4NxrA2oxH88h/fOG+BRJ0K64Wb3gCDpcD8wbb29CJpu
> zi3xnmZyGHWfV25rj5u3vlbLnbviZ4C8edSBeqwKBPs1LZ8ULhi+1acoZiBfvx/u
> 121NGKcC13dr09idTUk9d4JCvKbmCxsDtJ6TS/b6kL7DnkgX+ggq5KLcdowAFq8a
> P0Nkbh6C53C8t0X+jZRrqvGvPx7EvLvi0ocdhQTKUKqimVc44DhyVVs9NicNZdvZ
> +aIukLu+b55Gdo00WeqMh+LqZT5yBaDGmXQKAbKdWcKf6bHk+gfL+m+9xl6IXhZR
> ySbSvJzxdIfr93lztcJO
> =eApo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email