Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sun, 05 January 2014 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C7B1AC828 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 23:45:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pUcmRxex56nL for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 23:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121581AC7F3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 23:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1VziM7-0003zl-Ui for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 07:42:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 07:42:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1VziM7-0003zl-Ui@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1VziM1-0003uu-1N for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 07:42:37 +0000
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com ([173.38.203.51]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1VziLp-0005fo-7f for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 07:42:30 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3497; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1388907745; x=1390117345; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=6LFsK/RU9OnBrykvzzwIPqMgS6gXuuiUjgH7dhHMBWg=; b=hWgiBivm2faO91tSjg3FDkMvxFdzPCiPqeWPYV0tJPTiBTH7ty0lGhyg +92QugJJtGe3HMfWRVqtVFc+82Wyt+ke85T1S5poqPlf6CT45KA2Fg5i5 dICr8ruZG5M34VNj/bvA6W2QBMTJjtlcsMLEuaNGFw1nwKeojFrMsTJrM I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFAFwMyVKQ/khR/2dsb2JhbABYgws4g1O2LoEMFnSCJQEBAQQjVAEBEAsECgoJFgsCAgkDAgECASsaBgEMAQcBAYgADaoMmUsTBI8PB4JvgUgEmBeSFYMuOw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,606,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="3197171"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2014 07:41:58 +0000
Received: from mctiny.local ([10.61.169.225]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s057fvmS023668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 5 Jan 2014 07:41:57 GMT
Message-ID: <52C90CC6.9070407@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 08:41:58 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CAFewVt6j0yaRboARj=wpaVO2s9M6j7_za-GXLp9ZWqkFtSys8A@mail.gmail.com> <eme0c50675-de24-47c2-a612-28ffe926e3fd@bodybag> <CAA4WUYj6MCnqLL8-uK_V6WUQv+f1S_DEMio+wLB_DC9CY9xUgA@mail.gmail.com> <52B02095.2010508@cisco.com> <CAA4WUYiZWNtJupQ-6bXO3aNXz1B0qBKoTX9-z-XEjdzTptTLDQ@mail.gmail.com> <52B0A45E.2010901@cisco.com> <D14D3664-5C9B-4270-9CAC-176E7042A1DF@mnot.net> <52B15621.8060806@cisco.com> <EB1061CD-E2C5-4288-BD18-B692ED9EC389@apple.com> <CAP+FsNfbLxJ5nLHSg-NpxyA47y0uYGkowfcOSxkUwREizYFwEw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+pLO_gn7=wvP08orNeqnxjMXDhFaG4hnhMEk5iMZB37XOOoeA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+pLO_gn7=wvP08orNeqnxjMXDhFaG4hnhMEk5iMZB37XOOoeA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030007070007090002070208"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=173.38.203.51; envelope-from=lear@cisco.com; helo=aer-iport-1.cisco.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.059, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.124, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1VziLp-0005fo-7f a6d48bba40ea4f9b19fe8852df43abe0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/52C90CC6.9070407@cisco.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/21715
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I don't view this as non-browser; just specialized browser.  Think
printers, B2B EDI (pardon the antiquated term), intrabusiness EDI (think
Oracle), and the like.  Something where a user isn't sitting at a screen
at one end of the connection.

Eliot


On 12/21/13 2:48 AM, Jeff Pinner wrote:
>
>
>     @Elliot
>     My understanding of what Jeff Pinner has been saying is that the
>     stuff we've been doing has been quite useful in practice (today)
>     for Twitter.
>
>     -=R
>
>  
> Just to insert some data on the "usefulness" of HTTP/2 for the
> non-browsers use-case, at Twitter we have deployed SPDY on our iOS
> client, and when connecting to our API, we have observed as much as a
> 30% decrease in latency over HTTP/1.1.
> (See https://blog.twitter.com/2013/cocoaspdy-spdy-for-ios-os-x)
>
>